Nissan Micra 2003: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 52 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2003 Nissan Micra were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2003 Nissan Micra follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 7,303 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
52 in every 100
Did not pass first time
48 in every 1003,525 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
22 yearsabout 75,696 miles
First tests counted
7,303

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Headlight aim12 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Number plate lights10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2003 Nissan Micra vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the number plate lights (rear): 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 3,509 of 3,525 failed first attempts (99.5%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Number plate lights (rear)

Failed on 342 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Registration plate lamps must light up the rear registration plate and operate at the same time as the position lamps. A missing or inoperative lamp is Major when the plate has only one lamp or all its lamps are not working, and Minor when the plate has several lamps or light sources and not all have failed. A lamp throwing direct white light to the rear is also Minor.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 152 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 122 first tests, 6.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 149 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Headlight aim not tested (front)

Failed on 26 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Headlamp aim recorded as not tested, or unable to be tested, is a Major failure. These results must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason must be included in the additional information box.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Five faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front): 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 109 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover is Major, and so is one that no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A cover that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. DVSA uses one wording for the dust cover on any suspension joint.

Wheel bearings (rear)

Failed on 145 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive play in a wheel bearing, or a bearing that is excessively rough, is Major. Play so excessive that the bearing is likely to break up or directional control is impaired is Dangerous, and so is a bearing so rough that it is likely to overheat or break up.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 92 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 282 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 241 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 233 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 541 first tests, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Steering

One fault: track rod end (front), 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Track rod end (front)

Failed on 330 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is Major, and one worn to the extent there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. A dust cover that is damaged but still keeps dirt out is Minor, and one missing or no longer keeping dirt out is Major. Testers must tell wear from a joint's built-in clearance or spring loading.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 110 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 234 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 42 first tests15 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake light (rear)

Noted on 45 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Wheel condition (front)

Noted on 97 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Macpherson strut (front)

Noted on 65 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Vehicle structure condition (rear)

Noted on 85 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
52in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
10in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
38in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 51.7% of 7,303 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 62.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 10 fixed and the 38 not fixed make the 48 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002003201020152020Older cars
4060801002000200320102020

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 51 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199655 in every 100390
199754 in every 100511
199853 in every 100998
199953 in every 1001,611
200052 in every 1002,059
200153 in every 1003,180
200254 in every 1005,719
2003 This car52 in every 1007,303
200451 in every 1008,187
200550 in every 10012,239
200653 in every 10014,777
200755 in every 10011,492
200858 in every 10012,819
200958 in every 10014,267
201059 in every 10014,496
201161 in every 10011,937
201262 in every 10010,933
201364 in every 10011,066
201469 in every 10013,596
201572 in every 10012,552
201673 in every 10010,366
201767 in every 10012,148
201869 in every 1009,549
201978 in every 1008,211
202082 in every 1005,989
202189 in every 1006,438
202291 in every 1005,542

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2003 Micra.

Of 2003 Micra vehicles with under 51,000 miles, 64 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 104,000 miles or more, 44 in every 100 did.

Under 51,0001,462 tests
64
51,000–68,0001,410 tests
55
68,000–84,000 Typical car1,496 tests
51
84,000–104,0001,435 tests
46
104,000 and over1,473 tests
44

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 51,00068,000–84,000104,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.57.39.0
Headlight aim4.35.76.3
Number plate lights1.45.56.6
Track rod end (front)2.34.95.0
Headlight (front)2.95.24.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

19in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

61in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

8in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2003 Nissan Micra follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 14 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 51.7% of 7,303 first MOTs on the 2003 Nissan Micra passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 62.4%. Among 3,525 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Number plate lights (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (9.7% of those tests; 342 observed failures; about 3.4× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2003 Nissan Micra at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (13.8%), Headlight aim (12.3%) and Number plate lights (9.7%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Number plate lights (rear) (9.7% of those tests; 342 observed failures; about 3.4× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Number plate lights (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (9.7% of those tests; 342 observed failures; about 3.4× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2003 Nissan Micra include Number plate lights (rear), Side repeater indicators, Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2003 Nissan Micra (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check