Nissan Leaf 2017: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 76 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2017 Nissan Leaf were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension arm ball joint (front).

Summary

A 2017 Nissan Leaf passed first time about 3 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2016 and 2018 model years.

At a glance

How 4,697 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
76 in every 100
Did not pass first time
24 in every 1001,133 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
8 yearsabout 51,803 miles
First tests counted
4,697

What failed most often

  1. Suspension arm ball joint (front)20 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre condition (front)13 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre tread depth (front)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2017 Nissan Leaf vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm ball joint (front), 6.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,133 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 230 first tests6.2 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 40 first tests, 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Four faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the handbrake lever: 4.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 26 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 64 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Brake performance (roller test, front)

Failed on 27 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 33 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Brake discs (front)

Failed on 44 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: individual sidelight or tail light (front), 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 53 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 193 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Noted on 31 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Noted on 29 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Wheel condition (front)

Noted on 20 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
76in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
20in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 75.9% of 4,697 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 79.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 20 not fixed make the 24 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020172020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020172020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 78 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
201163 in every 100375
201262 in every 100408
201357 in every 1001,148
201460 in every 1002,854
201565 in every 1003,785
201666 in every 1003,724
2017 This car76 in every 1004,697
201880 in every 1004,627
201984 in every 1004,664
202085 in every 1007,191
202189 in every 1008,202
202291 in every 1008,331

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2017 Leaf.

Of 2017 Leaf vehicles with under 36,000 miles, 84 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 71,000 miles or more, 66 in every 100 did.

Under 36,000972 tests
84
36,000–47,000939 tests
79
47,000–57,000 Typical car875 tests
78
57,000–71,000970 tests
72
71,000 and over941 tests
66

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 36,00047,000–57,00071,000 and over
Suspension arm ball joint (front)1.25.08.7
Tyre condition (front)2.31.94.0
Tyre tread depth (front)0.81.73.1
Windscreen wipers (front)1.71.01.7
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)0.31.42.2

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

51in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

20in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2017 Nissan Leaf passed first time about 3 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2016 and 2018 model years. In 2025, 75.9% of 4,697 first MOTs on the 2017 Nissan Leaf passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 79.6%. Among 1,133 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm ball joint (front) appears more often than on similar cars (20.3% of those tests; 230 observed failures; about 6.2× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2017 Nissan Leaf at the first attempt were Suspension arm ball joint (front) (20.3%), Tyre condition (front) (12.7%) and Tyre tread depth (front) (8.0%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm ball joint (front) (20.3% of those tests; 230 observed failures; about 6.2× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm ball joint (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (20.3% of those tests; 230 observed failures; about 6.2× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2017 Nissan Leaf include Suspension arm ball joint (front), Handbrake lever, Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2017 Nissan Leaf (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check