Model Reports 4 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Mitsubishi Shogun 2006: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 57 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2006 Mitsubishi Shogun were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension mounting area (rear).

Summary

The 2006 Mitsubishi Shogun follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,119 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
57 in every 100
Did not pass first time
43 in every 100913 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
19 yearsabout 123,566 miles
First tests counted
2,119

What failed most often

  1. Suspension mounting area (rear)13 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Suspension arm ball joint (front)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2006 Mitsubishi Shogun vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Four faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front): 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 911 of 913 failed first attempts (99.8%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 57 first tests14 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

An anti-roll bar pin or bush that is excessively worn is Major, and one likely to become detached is graded Dangerous. The wording is DVSA's general rule for a suspension pin, bush or joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 42 first tests, 6.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (front)

Failed on 46 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Wheel bearings (front)

Failed on 42 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive play in a wheel bearing, or a bearing that is excessively rough, is Major. Play so excessive that the bearing is likely to break up or directional control is impaired is Dangerous, and so is a bearing so rough that it is likely to overheat or break up.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 110 first tests, 8.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Failed on 122 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Steering

One fault: steering rack (front), 7.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Steering rack (front)

Failed on 46 first tests7.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Steering gear casing retaining devices dangerously loose, or visible relative movement to the chassis or bodywork, is graded Dangerous. A casing not properly attached, or fractured, is Major, but a fracture that affects the stability or attachment of the casing is Dangerous. A gaiter damaged but still keeping dirt out is Minor, and Major once missing or no longer doing so.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt mounting area (rear), 5.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Seat belt mounting area (rear)

Failed on 35 first tests5.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A seat belt anchorage likely to become detached in the event of a collision is graded Dangerous. The load bearing structure near an anchorage, called a prescribed area, is Major when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Anchorage points are inspected for all seat belts fitted, except a belt with no corresponding seat.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

Two faults. The strongest is the chassis condition (rear): 4.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Chassis condition (rear)

Failed on 63 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A main load-bearing structural member that is fractured, deformed, modified or inadequately repaired is Major when structural rigidity is significantly reduced, and Dangerous where steering or braking is likely to be adversely affected. Corrosion of the body, cab or chassis at a mounting point is Dangerous where overall security or stability is impaired.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 49 first tests, 3.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Chassis condition (front)

Failed on 31 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A main load-bearing structural member that is fractured, deformed, modified or inadequately repaired is Major when structural rigidity is significantly reduced, and Dangerous where steering or braking is likely to be adversely affected. Corrosion of the body, cab or chassis at a mounting point is Dangerous where overall security or stability is impaired.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 20 first tests, 4.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel emissions not tested, 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions not tested

Failed on 24 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

An emissions test on a diesel that is unable to be completed is graded Major. The failure wording 'not tested' carries the same Major grade.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One fault: brake performance (roller test, front), 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance (roller test, front)

Failed on 46 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar linkage pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 28 first tests12 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 24 first tests4.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Noted on 73 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Vehicle structure condition (rear)

Noted on 29 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
57in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
6in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
37in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 56.9% of 2,119 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 62.8%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 6 fixed and the 37 not fixed make the 43 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002006201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100200620102020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 55 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200155 in every 100401
200260 in every 100712
200358 in every 1001,259
200459 in every 1002,376
200558 in every 1002,651
2006 This car57 in every 1002,119
200757 in every 1001,730
200860 in every 100773
200961 in every 100531
201063 in every 100934
201165 in every 1001,008
201267 in every 100622
201370 in every 100859
201473 in every 1001,478
201577 in every 1001,777
201677 in every 1001,487
201780 in every 1001,123
201881 in every 1001,089
201981 in every 100695
202083 in every 100652
202186 in every 1001,129

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2006 Shogun.

Of 2006 Shogun vehicles with under 91,000 miles, 63 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 160,000 miles or more, 55 in every 100 did.

Under 91,000429 tests
63
91,000–113,000415 tests
58
113,000–133,000 Typical car428 tests
53
133,000–160,000426 tests
56
160,000 and over418 tests
55

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 91,000113,000–133,000160,000 and over
Suspension mounting area (rear)4.04.78.1
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)4.74.25.7
Suspension arm ball joint (front)2.34.23.8
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)0.54.03.3
Windscreen washers2.63.53.3

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

18in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

65in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2006 Mitsubishi Shogun follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Suspension mounting area (rear), about 13 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 56.9% of 2,119 first MOTs on the 2006 Mitsubishi Shogun passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 62.8%. Among 913 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front) appears more often than on similar cars (6.3% of those tests; 57 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2006 Mitsubishi Shogun at the first attempt were Suspension mounting area (rear) (13.4%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (10.9%) and Suspension arm ball joint (front) (9.5%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front) (6.3% of those tests; 57 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (6.3% of those tests; 57 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2006 Mitsubishi Shogun include Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front), Steering rack (front), Seat belt mounting area (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2006 Mitsubishi Shogun (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check