Model Reports 8 min read Updated 11 Sep 2026 DVSA open data · 712 tests analysed

Mitsubishi Shogun 2002: reliability & common MOT faults

283 first-attempt MOT failures were recorded on the 2002 Mitsubishi Shogun in 2025. The item recorded most often on them was Component mounting prescribed areas (rear). Figures are among first-attempt failed MOT tests, not among all tests.

First-attempt pass rate 60.3% across 712 tests in 2025. On 712 tests that is too small a sample to separate this year from the Shoguns either side of it — treat the recorded failures as a checklist, not as a verdict on the year.

First-attempt pass

60.3%

of 712 first tests (2025)

First tests

712

test year 2025

Failed first attempts

283

failed first-attempt tests

Most common fail

19.9%

Component mounting prescribed areas (rear)

MOT pass rates

First-attempt and official-style rates among class 4 first tests of the year.

First-attempt pass

60.3%

of 712 first tests (2025)

Official-style pass

65.7%

incl. same-day PRS fixes

First tests

712

class 4 · first MOT of the year

Typical age 23.0 yrs · median mileage 121,250 mi

vs 2024: +3.9 pp first-attempt

Note:

  • Class 4 cars · first MOT of the year per vehicle · P/PRS/F outcomes (2025 data).
  • PRS (fixed at the station the same day) counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate.
  • Raw outcomes for this cohort — not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix.
  • MOT doesn't test engine or gearbox internals.

Common faults

Failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars.

These MOT failure patterns show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age, and mileage.

Shares below are measured across the 281 of 283 failed first attempts (99.3%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025 — the subset the age-and-mileage comparison can be computed on.

Standout: Component mounting prescribed areas (front) — 11.7% of this year's failed first attempts

Recorded on 33 of those tests. It tops the table on elevation — about 6.3× more often than on similar cars of the same age and mileage. On this year it is also the commonest failure, so it answers both questions at once. The full ranked list is in the table below.

No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.

Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
Component mounting prescribed areas (front)
Suspension > Component mounting prescribed areas
 Front 33 ×6.3 11.7% Likely
Steering rack (front)
Steering > Steering gear > Steering rack
 Front 21 ×5.4 7.5% Possible
Chassis condition (rear)
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
 Rear 21 ×3.2 7.5% Possible
Component mounting prescribed areas (rear)
Suspension > Component mounting prescribed areas
 Rear 56 ×2.7 19.9% Possible

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and about 2.0× more often than similar cars).

Note: Rates and comparisons are among first-attempt failed tests, not all MOTs. Patterns come from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer service bulletins, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Failures and advisories are listed separately.

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

There are too few 2002 Shoguns in the data to call this year good or bad. Judge the individual car, not the year.

What to check on a 2002 Shogun

The items that failed 2002 Shoguns most often, as a share of the year's failed first attempts. This is what goes wrong, not what is unusual — the table further up the page covers that.

  • Component mounting prescribed areas (rear) — recorded on 19.9% of failed first attempts

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

On 712 tests that is too small a sample to separate this year from the Shoguns either side of it — treat the recorded failures as a checklist, not as a verdict on the year. In 2025, 60.3% of 712 first MOTs on the 2002 Mitsubishi Shogun passed first time (PRS — items fixed at the station the same day — counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 65.7%. Among 283 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test y…
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that failed 2002 Mitsubishi Shoguns most often at the first attempt were Component mounting prescribed areas (rear) (19.9%) — each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong on the car. It is a different question from which patterns are unusual for the class, which the common-faults table answers.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Component mounting prescribed areas (front) (11.7% of those tests; 33 observed failures; about 6.3× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Component mounting prescribed areas (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (11.7% of those tests; 33 observed failures; about 6.3× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault — age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2002 Mitsubishi Shogun include Component mounting prescribed areas (front), Steering rack (front), Chassis condition (rear). These patterns show up more often than on similar cars after we filter out sparse noise — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2002 Mitsubishi Shogun (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars — not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics — this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces — but does not remove — differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • We never invent pass rates, star scores, or ranks when those data marts are missing.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check