MINI Hatch 2019: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 88 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2019 MINI Hatch were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

The 2019 MINI Hatch follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 48,093 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
88 in every 100
Did not pass first time
12 in every 1005,896 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
6 yearsabout 34,462 miles
First tests counted
48,093

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)20 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Windscreen wipers (front)15 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre tread depth (front)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2019 MINI Hatch vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Visibility

One fault: windscreen wipers (front), 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 5,895 of 5,896 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Windscreen wipers (front)

Failed on 869 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Only a clearly damaged or worn windscreen wiper needs to be rejected. A wiper that is missing or not working is graded Major, and so is a blade that is missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen. A defective blade is graded Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail.

Wheel condition (rear)

Noted on 43 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Wheel condition (front)

Noted on 115 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
88in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
2in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
10in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 87.7% of 48,093 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 90.5%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 2 fixed and the 10 not fixed make the 12 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

By fuel type

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol45,20034,056 miles8888
Hybrid2,63642,738 miles8687

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020152019Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102019Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200150 in every 1001,394
200253 in every 1006,184
200355 in every 1009,883
200455 in every 10014,270
200555 in every 10017,836
200656 in every 10017,365
200756 in every 10020,625
200858 in every 10021,902
200960 in every 10024,970
201065 in every 10029,511
201166 in every 10028,014
201271 in every 10033,870
201373 in every 10040,211
201479 in every 10030,471
201581 in every 10044,312
201684 in every 10044,778
201785 in every 10044,384
201887 in every 10043,078
2019 This car88 in every 10048,093
202088 in every 10035,781
202188 in every 10036,233
202290 in every 10035,706

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2019 MINI Hatch.

Of 2019 MINI Hatch vehicles with under 23,000 miles, 90 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 49,000 miles or more, 85 in every 100 did.

Under 23,00010,051 tests
90
23,000–31,0009,638 tests
89
31,000–39,000 Typical car9,661 tests
88
39,000–49,0009,002 tests
87
49,000 and over9,737 tests
85

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 23,00031,000–39,00049,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)2.42.52.8
Windscreen wipers (front)2.31.71.4
Tyre tread depth (front)0.30.81.8
Brake pads (rear)0.70.61.2
Headlight aim0.40.50.8

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

66in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

9in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

4in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2019 MINI Hatch follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (front), about 20 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 87.7% of 48,093 first MOTs on the 2019 MINI Hatch passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 90.5%. Among 5,896 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Windscreen wipers (front) appears more often than on similar cars (14.7% of those tests; 869 observed failures; about 2.3× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2019 MINI Hatch at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (20.5%), Windscreen wipers (front) (14.7%) and Tyre tread depth (front) (7.8%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Windscreen wipers (front) (14.7% of those tests; 869 observed failures; about 2.3× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Windscreen wipers (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (14.7% of those tests; 869 observed failures; about 2.3× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2019 MINI Hatch include Windscreen wipers (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2019 MINI Hatch (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check