MINI Hatch 2002: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 53 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2002 MINI Hatch were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Headlight aim.

Summary

The 2002 MINI Hatch follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 6,184 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
53 in every 100
Did not pass first time
47 in every 1002,922 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
23 yearsabout 105,528 miles
First tests counted
6,184

What failed most often

  1. Headlight aim18 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Airbag warning light15 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2002 MINI Hatch vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Body and structure

Two faults. The strongest is the fuel cap: 7.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,644 of 2,922 failed first attempts (90.5%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like. 9.5% of failures are excluded because no mileage was recorded, so treat these shares as indicative for this model year.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Fuel cap

Failed on 94 first tests7.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing or ineffective fuel filler cap is Major, as is a plain fuel system leak, while a fuel system leaking excessively or a risk of fire has its own, separate wording. A fuel tank with a hole, or a split filler neck, from which fuel can leak must be failed for leaking even if the hole or split is above the fuel line.

Exhaust system (rear)

Failed on 135 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

Two faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the brake pedal: 6.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pedal

Failed on 80 first tests6.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A brake pedal rubber worn smooth is not a defect, and nor is a worn design pattern on an aftermarket rubber. A pedal with no rubber is rejected if its grooves or raised grip sections are worn smooth, unless the vehicle was made without them. Insufficient reserve travel is Major, but a vehicle is failed for it only if the pedal or lever is touching the floor or handlebar.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 29 first tests, 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 154 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 489 first tests, 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 67 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 5.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 400 first tests5.7 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 21 first tests, 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

One fault: wheel bearings (front), 4.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Wheel bearings (front)

Failed on 159 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive play in a wheel bearing, or a bearing that is excessively rough, is Major. Play so excessive that the bearing is likely to break up or directional control is impaired is Dangerous, and so is a bearing so rough that it is likely to overheat or break up.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the headlight levelling device: 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Headlight levelling device

Failed on 63 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A headlamp levelling device that is inoperative is graded Major, and so is a manual levelling device that cannot be operated from the driver's seat. Vehicles with high intensity discharge or LED dipped beam headlamps may have a self-levelling system, and if fitted it must work. Where it is not easy to tell, testers give the benefit of the doubt, and motor caravans are not checked.

Headlight aim

Failed on 463 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Beam aim too high, too low or off to either side is Major. Where a driver's beam aim control is fitted, the aim is tested without altering the setting, and rechecked at the highest setting only if it would fail for being too low. Masks or converter kits on right hand dip headlamps are acceptable.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Power steering pipes and hoses (front)

Noted on 142 first tests6.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Power steering pump

Noted on 26 first tests6.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Other power steering components

Noted on 56 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Noted on 404 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Noted on 46 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
53in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
9in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
38in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 52.7% of 6,184 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 61.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 38 not fixed make the 47 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020022005201020152020Newer cars
406080100200220102020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 51 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200150 in every 1001,394
2002 This car53 in every 1006,184
200355 in every 1009,883
200455 in every 10014,270
200555 in every 10017,836
200656 in every 10017,365
200756 in every 10020,625
200858 in every 10021,902
200960 in every 10024,970
201065 in every 10029,511
201166 in every 10028,014
201271 in every 10033,870
201373 in every 10040,211
201479 in every 10030,471
201581 in every 10044,312
201684 in every 10044,778
201785 in every 10044,384
201887 in every 10043,078
201988 in every 10048,093
202088 in every 10035,781
202188 in every 10036,233
202290 in every 10035,706

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2002 MINI Hatch.

Of 2002 MINI Hatch vehicles with under 75,000 miles, 61 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 134,000 miles or more, 49 in every 100 did.

Under 75,0001,130 tests
61
75,000–97,0001,123 tests
54
97,000–114,000 Typical car1,122 tests
52
114,000–134,0001,143 tests
51
134,000 and over1,150 tests
49

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 75,00097,000–114,000134,000 and over
Headlight aim7.08.510.0
Airbag warning light6.17.88.2
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)4.24.26.4
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)1.64.36.4
Petrol emissions (with catalyst)3.03.64.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

18in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

60in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2002 MINI Hatch follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Headlight aim, about 18 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 52.7% of 6,184 first MOTs on the 2002 MINI Hatch passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 61.6%. Among 2,922 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Airbag warning light appears more often than on similar cars (15.1% of those tests; 400 observed failures; about 5.7× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2002 MINI Hatch at the first attempt were Headlight aim (17.5%), Airbag warning light (15.1%) and Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (11.5%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Airbag warning light (15.1% of those tests; 400 observed failures; about 5.7× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Airbag warning light shows up more often than on similar cars (15.1% of those tests; 400 observed failures; about 5.7× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2002 MINI Hatch include Airbag warning light, Fuel cap, Brake pedal. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2002 MINI Hatch (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check