Model Reports 5 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

MG ZS 2019: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 75 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2019 MG ZS were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Headlight (front).

Summary

At the same mileage, an electric 2019 MG ZS passed first time more often than a petrol one: 80 in every 100 against 75 in every 100.

At a glance

How 8,181 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
75 in every 100
Did not pass first time
25 in every 1002,023 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
6 yearsabout 39,155 miles
First tests counted
8,181

What failed most often

  1. Headlight (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Petrol emissions (with catalyst)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre condition (front)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2019 MG ZS vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

One fault: wheel bearings (front), 16 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,021 of 2,023 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Wheel bearings (front)

Failed on 77 first tests16 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive play in a wheel bearing, or a bearing that is excessively rough, is Major. Play so excessive that the bearing is likely to break up or directional control is impaired is Dangerous, and so is a bearing so rough that it is likely to overheat or break up.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 35 first tests, 11 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the petrol emissions (with catalyst): 9.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 199 first tests9.4 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Petrol engine warning light

Failed on 103 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) on a petrol engine is a Major failure when it is illuminated indicating a malfunction. The detail line DVSA gives for the same row also names an inoperative lamp. The test covers only certain petrol vehicles, depending on their age, size and fuel type.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

Three faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the handbrake lever: 6.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 44 first tests6.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 105 first tests5.5 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 103 first tests, 5.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 142 first tests5.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 449 first tests, 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 124 first tests5.0 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the headlight aim not tested (front): 6.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Headlight aim not tested (front)

Failed on 51 first tests6.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Headlamp aim recorded as not tested, or unable to be tested, is a Major failure. These results must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason must be included in the additional information box.

Headlight (front)

Failed on 232 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

On vehicles first used on or after a set date, a halogen headlamp unit converted to take HID or LED bulbs fails for light source and lamp not compatible, which is Major. A complete unit built with those light sources is not failed for that. The precise position of the lamps is not part of the inspection beyond a visual look to see that they sit at about the same height and distance from each side.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre pressure monitoring system, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre pressure monitoring system

Failed on 96 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously inoperative is graded Major, and so is one listed as malfunctioning or obviously inoperative. The Minor row uses the word malfunctioning too, but its detail is a warning lamp indicating a fault, and it also covers a tyre that is obviously under-inflated.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Coil spring (front)

Noted on 60 first tests32 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Noted on 30 first tests22 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Noted on 20 first tests6.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Engine oil leaks

Noted on 53 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
75in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
20in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 75.3% of 8,181 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 79.7%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 20 not fixed make the 25 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

By fuel type

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol7,58838,790 miles7575
Electric59343,651 miles7880

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201720182019202020212022Older carsNewer cars
406080100201720182019202020212022Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 80 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
201766 in every 100333
201874 in every 1004,845
2019 This car75 in every 1008,181
202081 in every 10011,763
202186 in every 10014,459
202285 in every 10017,287

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2019 MG ZS.

Of 2019 MG ZS vehicles with under 27,000 miles, 85 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 54,000 miles or more, 67 in every 100 did.

Under 27,0001,707 tests
85
27,000–35,0001,506 tests
77
35,000–43,000 Typical car1,616 tests
76
43,000–54,0001,729 tests
71
54,000 and over1,621 tests
67

Which fuel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested		Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol38,790 miles7575
Electric43,651 miles7880

Figures are in every 100 first tests. At the same mileage, electric passed more often (80 against 75 in every 100).

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 27,00035,000–43,00054,000 and over
Headlight (front)1.23.23.5
Petrol emissions (with catalyst)2.02.62.5
Tyre condition (front)1.11.93.5
Brake pads (front)0.63.01.5
Tyre tread depth (front)0.81.43.6

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

45in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

26in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

At the same mileage, an electric 2019 MG ZS passed first time more often than a petrol one: 80 in every 100 against 75 in every 100. In 2025, 75.3% of 8,181 first MOTs on the 2019 MG ZS passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 79.7%. Among 2,023 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Petrol emissions (with catalyst) appears more often than on similar cars (9.8% of those tests; 199 observed failures; about 9.4× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2019 MG ZS at the first attempt were Headlight (front) (11.5%), Petrol emissions (with catalyst) (9.8%) and Tyre condition (front) (9.2%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Petrol emissions (with catalyst) (9.8% of those tests; 199 observed failures; about 9.4× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Petrol emissions (with catalyst) shows up more often than on similar cars (9.8% of those tests; 199 observed failures; about 9.4× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2019 MG ZS include Petrol emissions (with catalyst), Brake performance (roller test, rear), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2019 MG ZS (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check