Mercedes-Benz SLK 2013: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 74 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

The 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 4,318 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
74 in every 100
Did not pass first time
26 in every 1001,116 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
12 yearsabout 62,646 miles
First tests counted
4,318

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)19 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Coil spring (rear)12 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Three faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the anti-lock braking system (ABS): 5.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,114 of 1,116 failed first attempts (99.8%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 57 first tests5.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Electronic stability control

Failed on 38 first tests5.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

An ESC warning lamp is failed only when the tester is certain it indicates an ESC malfunction, because the lamp takes various forms and the owner's handbook may need checking. The system is also called ESP, VDC or DSC, among many other names. Every failure row is Major, covering the lamp, wheel speed sensors, wiring, other components and the switch.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 28 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 26 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 144 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Four faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front): 4.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 54 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover is Major, and so is one that no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A cover that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. DVSA uses one wording for the dust cover on any suspension joint.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 126 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 131 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Shock absorbers (front)

Failed on 40 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

Two wear patterns. The strongest is the tyre tread depth (rear): 4.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 103 first tests4.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 190 first tests, 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre condition (front)

Failed on 209 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Exposed or damaged ply or cords are graded Dangerous. A cut in excess of the requirements and deep enough to reach the ply or cords is Major, and testers may open the cut with a blunt instrument to check its depth. A tyre contacting the vehicle through flexing or suspension movement is not a defect; fouling fails only at the time of test.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Wheel bearings (front)

Noted on 77 first tests13 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Noted on 55 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
74in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
3in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
23in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 74.2% of 4,318 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 76.5%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 3 fixed and the 23 not fixed make the 26 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel3,10466,952 miles7273
Petrol1,21451,383 miles8076

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002000200520102013Older carsNewer cars
406080100200020102013Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 75 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199768 in every 100551
199870 in every 100846
199971 in every 1001,157
200069 in every 1001,457
200170 in every 1001,784
200271 in every 1001,588
200367 in every 1001,449
200466 in every 1002,631
200567 in every 1004,173
200667 in every 1003,277
200767 in every 1003,223
200867 in every 1002,946
200969 in every 1002,332
201070 in every 1001,935
201175 in every 1002,396
201274 in every 1005,259
2013 This car74 in every 1004,318
201476 in every 1004,621
201580 in every 1004,657
201682 in every 1001,193

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK.

Of 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK vehicles with under 44,000 miles, 87 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 87,000 miles or more, 64 in every 100 did.

Under 44,000869 tests
87
44,000–57,000871 tests
78
57,000–69,000 Typical car842 tests
74
69,000–87,000886 tests
68
87,000 and over847 tests
64

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel66,952 miles7273
Petrol51,383 miles8076

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 66,952 against 51,383). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 44,00057,000–69,00087,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)2.34.57.1
Coil spring (rear)2.22.53.2
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)0.63.05.1
Tyre tread depth (rear)0.82.44.1
Suspension arm ball joint (front)0.31.94.7

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

45in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

25in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

8in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (front), about 19 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 74.2% of 4,318 first MOTs on the 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 76.5%. Among 1,116 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Anti-lock braking system (ABS) appears more often than on similar cars (5.1% of those tests; 57 observed failures; about 5.1× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (18.8%), Coil spring (rear) (11.8%) and Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front) (11.3%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Anti-lock braking system (ABS) (5.1% of those tests; 57 observed failures; about 5.1× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Anti-lock braking system (ABS) shows up more often than on similar cars (5.1% of those tests; 57 observed failures; about 5.1× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK include Anti-lock braking system (ABS), Electronic stability control, Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check