Mercedes-Benz CLS 2013: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 71 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

The 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,809 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
71 in every 100
Did not pass first time
29 in every 100802 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
12 yearsabout 99,978 miles
First tests counted
2,809

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)15 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Coil spring (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre tread depth (rear)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Four faults. The strongest is the suspension sub-frame (rear): 15 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 801 of 802 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Failed on 24 first tests15 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension sub-frame insecurely attached to the chassis or axle is Major, and Dangerous when it is insecure and impairing directional stability. A sub-frame that is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail is also Dangerous. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens it is Major.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 81 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 25 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover is Major, and so is one that no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A cover that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. DVSA uses one wording for the dust cover on any suspension joint.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 82 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

Three faults. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (front): 13 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 71 first tests13 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 160 first tests, 8.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 60 first tests6.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 107 first tests, 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 30 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Tyres

Three wear patterns. The strongest is the tyre tread depth (rear): 3.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 82 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Tyre condition (rear)

Failed on 106 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Exposed or damaged ply or cords are graded Dangerous. A cut in excess of the requirements and deep enough to reach the ply or cords is Major, and testers may open the cut with a blunt instrument to check its depth. A tyre contacting the vehicle through flexing or suspension movement is not a defect; fouling fails only at the time of test.

Tyre condition (front)

Failed on 122 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Exposed or damaged ply or cords are graded Dangerous. A cut in excess of the requirements and deep enough to reach the ply or cords is Major, and testers may open the cut with a blunt instrument to check its depth. A tyre contacting the vehicle through flexing or suspension movement is not a defect; fouling fails only at the time of test.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Wheel bearings (front)

Noted on 67 first tests10 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Wheel condition (front)

Noted on 27 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
71in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
2in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
27in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 71.4% of 2,809 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 73.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 2 fixed and the 27 not fixed make the 29 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100200520102013Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102013Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 74 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200571 in every 100799
200670 in every 1001,098
200767 in every 1001,373
200869 in every 1001,128
200966 in every 100895
201065 in every 100927
201173 in every 1001,026
201274 in every 1001,012
2013 This car71 in every 1002,809
201474 in every 1001,644
201578 in every 1002,729
201679 in every 1002,000
201780 in every 1001,415
201883 in every 100900
201982 in every 1001,002

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS.

Of 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS vehicles with under 74,000 miles, 76 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 132,000 miles or more, 69 in every 100 did.

Under 74,000583 tests
76
74,000–92,000545 tests
72
92,000–109,000 Typical car550 tests
69
109,000–132,000569 tests
71
132,000 and over561 tests
69

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 74,00092,000–109,000132,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)2.96.25.2
Coil spring (front)2.43.65.0
Tyre tread depth (rear)1.53.63.2
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)1.03.53.7
Rigid brake pipes (front)1.72.23.0

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

42in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

29in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

11in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (front), about 15 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 71.4% of 2,809 first MOTs on the 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 73.4%. Among 802 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension sub-frame (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (3.0% of those tests; 24 observed failures; about 15× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (15.2%), Coil spring (front) (14.5%) and Tyre tread depth (rear) (10.2%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension sub-frame (rear) (3.0% of those tests; 24 observed failures; about 15× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension sub-frame (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.0% of those tests; 24 observed failures; about 15× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS include Suspension sub-frame (rear), Rigid brake pipes (front), Handbrake lever. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check