Mercedes-Benz CLA 2016: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 75 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

The 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 7,223 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
75 in every 100
Did not pass first time
25 in every 1001,794 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
9 yearsabout 79,111 miles
First tests counted
7,223

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)17 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Coil spring (rear)17 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Road wheels

One fault: wheel condition (front), 12 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,791 of 1,794 failed first attempts (99.8%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Wheel condition (front)

Failed on 41 first tests12 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel with any fracture or welding defect is graded Dangerous. So is a tyre retaining ring likely to come off, or a wheel distorted or worn to the extent that the wheel or tyre is likely to become detached. A wheel that is badly distorted, or has an excessively worn spigot mounting, is graded Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 35 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 6.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 110 first tests6.7 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front): 6.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 73 first tests6.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover is Major, and so is one that no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A cover that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. DVSA uses one wording for the dust cover on any suspension joint.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 178 first tests5.9 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 309 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel engine warning light, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel engine warning light

Failed on 135 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

An engine malfunction indicator lamp that is illuminated to show a malfunction is graded Major on a diesel, but only on the diesels the test covers, which depends on the vehicle type and when it was first used. DVSA lists it under exhaust emissions for compression ignition engines, and the detail line for the row also names an inoperative lamp.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre condition (front), 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre condition (front)

Failed on 312 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Exposed or damaged ply or cords are graded Dangerous. A cut in excess of the requirements and deep enough to reach the ply or cords is Major, and testers may open the cut with a blunt instrument to check its depth. A tyre contacting the vehicle through flexing or suspension movement is not a defect; fouling fails only at the time of test.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Noted on 22 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
75in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
21in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 75.2% of 7,223 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 78.7%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 21 not fixed make the 25 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel5,24383,260 miles7475
Petrol1,98067,926 miles7774

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020162020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020162020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 77 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
201369 in every 1001,981
201471 in every 1004,076
201573 in every 1006,449
2016 This car75 in every 1007,223
201777 in every 1007,815
201880 in every 1007,956
201983 in every 1007,812
202084 in every 1007,032
202186 in every 1009,055
202287 in every 10010,638

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA.

Of 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA vehicles with under 59,000 miles, 82 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 103,000 miles or more, 71 in every 100 did.

Under 59,0001,458 tests
82
59,000–73,0001,473 tests
76
73,000–86,000 Typical car1,425 tests
75
86,000–103,0001,436 tests
71
103,000 and over1,425 tests
71

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel83,260 miles7475
Petrol67,926 miles7774

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 83,260 against 67,926). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 59,00073,000–86,000103,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)3.93.94.2
Coil spring (rear)3.24.65.5
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)1.12.43.5
Tyre tread depth (front)1.42.72.7
Diesel engine warning light0.81.33.6

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

48in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

25in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (front), about 17 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 75.2% of 7,223 first MOTs on the 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 78.7%. Among 1,794 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Airbag warning light appears more often than on similar cars (6.1% of those tests; 110 observed failures; about 6.7× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (17.4%), Coil spring (rear) (17.3%) and Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front) (9.9%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Airbag warning light (6.1% of those tests; 110 observed failures; about 6.7× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Airbag warning light shows up more often than on similar cars (6.1% of those tests; 110 observed failures; about 6.7× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA include Airbag warning light, Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front), Wheel condition (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLA (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check