Mercedes-Benz C-Class 2016: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 80 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2016 Mercedes-Benz C-Class were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (front).

Summary

The 2016 Mercedes-Benz C-Class follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 34,859 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
80 in every 100
Did not pass first time
20 in every 1006,931 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
9 yearsabout 77,080 miles
First tests counted
34,859

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Suspension arm ball joint (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre tread depth (rear)14 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2016 Mercedes-Benz C-Class vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre tread depth (rear), 4.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 6,923 of 6,931 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 941 first tests4.3 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One wear pattern: brake pads, 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pads

Failed on 29 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the coil spring (front): 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 988 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 974 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 593 first tests, 5.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the petrol engine warning light: 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol engine warning light

Failed on 498 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) on a petrol engine is a Major failure when it is illuminated indicating a malfunction. The detail line DVSA gives for the same row also names an inoperative lamp. The test covers only certain petrol vehicles, depending on their age, size and fuel type.

Diesel engine warning light

Failed on 494 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

An engine malfunction indicator lamp that is illuminated to show a malfunction is graded Major on a diesel, but only on the diesels the test covers, which depends on the vehicle type and when it was first used. DVSA lists it under exhaust emissions for compression ignition engines, and the detail line for the row also names an inoperative lamp.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Propeller shaft flexible couplings (rear)

Noted on 149 first tests61 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
80in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
3in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
17in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 80.1% of 34,859 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 83.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 3 fixed and the 17 not fixed make the 20 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

By fuel type

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel22,88680,357 miles7979
Petrol7,15158,594 miles8380
Hybrid3,89689,686 miles8384

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005201020162020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000201020162020Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 81 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199672 in every 100347
199768 in every 100584
199871 in every 100723
199968 in every 100644
200066 in every 100501
200164 in every 1001,041
200263 in every 1001,935
200358 in every 1003,438
200458 in every 1005,099
200559 in every 1006,889
200658 in every 1008,303
200761 in every 10010,849
200863 in every 10012,485
200964 in every 10011,974
201066 in every 10012,159
201167 in every 10017,849
201267 in every 10024,448
201369 in every 10022,380
201475 in every 10024,165
201578 in every 10032,615
2016 This car80 in every 10034,859
201781 in every 10037,580
201884 in every 10026,966
201985 in every 10023,530
202086 in every 1009,433
202187 in every 1005,769
202289 in every 1004,378

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2016 C-Class.

Of 2016 C-Class vehicles with under 53,000 miles, 86 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 106,000 miles or more, 76 in every 100 did.

Under 53,0006,810 tests
86
53,000–69,0006,884 tests
82
69,000–85,000 Typical car7,269 tests
78
85,000–106,0006,900 tests
78
106,000 and over6,977 tests
76

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel80,357 miles7979
Petrol58,594 miles8380

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 80,357 against 58,594). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 53,00069,000–85,000106,000 and over
Coil spring (front)1.93.22.6
Suspension arm ball joint (front)1.73.13.6
Tyre tread depth (rear)1.22.73.7
Tyre condition (front)2.52.82.6
Petrol engine warning light1.01.41.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

53in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

20in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2016 Mercedes-Benz C-Class follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Coil spring (front), about 14 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 80.1% of 34,859 first MOTs on the 2016 Mercedes-Benz C-Class passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 83.1%. Among 6,931 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Coil spring (front) appears more often than on similar cars (14.3% of those tests; 988 observed failures; about 3.0× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2016 Mercedes-Benz C-Class at the first attempt were Coil spring (front) (14.3%), Suspension arm ball joint (front) (14.1%) and Tyre tread depth (rear) (13.6%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Coil spring (front) (14.3% of those tests; 988 observed failures; about 3.0× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Coil spring (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (14.3% of those tests; 988 observed failures; about 3.0× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2016 Mercedes-Benz C-Class include Coil spring (front), Suspension arm ball joint (front), Petrol engine warning light. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2016 Mercedes-Benz C-Class (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check