Mercedes-Benz C-Class 2007: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 61 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension arm ball joint (front).

Summary

The 2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 10,849 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
61 in every 100
Did not pass first time
39 in every 1004,200 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
18 yearsabout 116,117 miles
First tests counted
10,849

What failed most often

  1. Suspension arm ball joint (front)21 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Coil spring (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the suspension arm ball joint (front): 3.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 4,178 of 4,200 failed first attempts (99.5%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 860 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 258 first tests, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 166 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover is Major, and so is one that no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A cover that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. DVSA uses one wording for the dust cover on any suspension joint.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 435 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: side repeater indicators, 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 163 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Road wheels

One fault: wheel fixings (front), 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Wheel fixings (front)

Failed on 87 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Wheel nuts, bolts and studs are the fixings that attach the road wheel. A wheel with a loose or missing wheel nut, bolt or stud is Major. If more than one is loose or missing, it is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre tread depth (rear), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 295 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One fault: rigid brake pipes (front), 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 129 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 455 first tests, 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 221 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Wheel bearings (front)

Noted on 400 first tests7.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar linkage pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 63 first tests7.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 72 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 86 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Anti-roll bar (front)

Noted on 28 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 58 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
61in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
31in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 61.3% of 10,849 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 68.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 31 not fixed make the 39 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol5,625102,396 miles6260
Diesel5,224133,342 miles6163

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002007201020152020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000200720102020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199672 in every 100347
199768 in every 100584
199871 in every 100723
199968 in every 100644
200066 in every 100501
200164 in every 1001,041
200263 in every 1001,935
200358 in every 1003,438
200458 in every 1005,099
200559 in every 1006,889
200658 in every 1008,303
2007 This car61 in every 10010,849
200863 in every 10012,485
200964 in every 10011,974
201066 in every 10012,159
201167 in every 10017,849
201267 in every 10024,448
201369 in every 10022,380
201475 in every 10024,165
201578 in every 10032,615
201680 in every 10034,859
201781 in every 10037,580
201884 in every 10026,966
201985 in every 10023,530
202086 in every 1009,433
202187 in every 1005,769
202289 in every 1004,378

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2007 C-Class.

Of 2007 C-Class vehicles with under 82,000 miles, 71 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 154,000 miles or more, 56 in every 100 did.

Under 82,0002,193 tests
71
82,000–106,0002,169 tests
61
106,000–127,000 Typical car2,089 tests
60
127,000–154,0002,176 tests
58
154,000 and over2,181 tests
56

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol102,396 miles6260
Diesel133,342 miles6163

Figures are in every 100 first tests. At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 82,000106,000–127,000154,000 and over
Suspension arm ball joint (front)5.17.99.3
Coil spring (front)3.04.44.5
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)3.13.52.7
Headlight aim1.43.53.9
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.42.84.7

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

27in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

49in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Suspension arm ball joint (front), about 21 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 61.3% of 10,849 first MOTs on the 2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 68.6%. Among 4,200 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm ball joint (front) appears more often than on similar cars (20.6% of those tests; 860 observed failures; about 3.6× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class at the first attempt were Suspension arm ball joint (front) (20.6%), Coil spring (front) (10.4%) and Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front) (8.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm ball joint (front) (20.6% of those tests; 860 observed failures; about 3.6× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm ball joint (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (20.6% of those tests; 860 observed failures; about 3.6× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class include Suspension arm ball joint (front), Side repeater indicators, Wheel fixings (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check