Mercedes-Benz A-Class 2008: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 58 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2008 Mercedes-Benz A-Class were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Drive shaft joints and boots (front).

Summary

The 2008 Mercedes-Benz A-Class follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 5,851 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
58 in every 100
Did not pass first time
42 in every 1002,484 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
17 yearsabout 86,578 miles
First tests counted
5,851

What failed most often

  1. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)15 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Windscreen washers13 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Shock absorbers (front)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2008 Mercedes-Benz A-Class vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the shock absorbers (front): 5.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,473 of 2,484 failed first attempts (99.6%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Shock absorbers (front)

Failed on 276 first tests5.3 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 240 first tests, 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 226 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 273 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 114 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Three faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the brake efficiency below minimum (roller test): 5.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 75 first tests5.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Service brake efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and efficiency less than half of the required value is graded Dangerous. On a roller brake tester, if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock, the efficiency requirement for that system counts as met.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 101 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 315 first tests, 3.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 200 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 425 first tests, 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 116 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: drive shaft joints and boots (front), 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 364 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Visibility

One fault: windscreen washers (front), 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Windscreen washers (front)

Failed on 316 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Windscreen washers that are not working, or do not provide sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen, are graded Major. They must provide enough fluid for the wipers to clear the windscreen effectively. Vehicles with an opening windscreen, or some other adequate view to the front, left and right, are not inspected for washers.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Seat belt condition (rear)

Noted on 54 first tests5.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Steering rack play

Noted on 26 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Flexible brake hoses (rear)

Noted on 178 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Flexible brake hoses (front)

Noted on 130 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
58in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
7in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
35in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 57.5% of 5,851 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 65.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 7 fixed and the 35 not fixed make the 42 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol4,43883,598 miles5857
Diesel1,41397,766 miles5658

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005200820152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020082020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200158 in every 100416
200255 in every 100654
200354 in every 100924
200454 in every 100879
200559 in every 1002,304
200657 in every 1003,559
200757 in every 1005,100
2008 This car58 in every 1005,851
200959 in every 1006,260
201062 in every 1005,713
201166 in every 1005,097
201266 in every 1004,998
201368 in every 10014,910
201469 in every 10022,196
201572 in every 10025,391
201675 in every 10036,342
201778 in every 10039,003
201882 in every 10039,403
201985 in every 10048,623
202087 in every 10033,980
202190 in every 10028,061
202291 in every 10016,574

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2008 A-Class.

Of 2008 A-Class vehicles with under 60,000 miles, 72 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 115,000 miles or more, 48 in every 100 did.

Under 60,0001,144 tests
72
60,000–79,0001,226 tests
59
79,000–95,000 Typical car1,111 tests
57
95,000–115,0001,165 tests
53
115,000 and over1,186 tests
48

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 60,00079,000–95,000115,000 and over
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)2.16.59.6
Windscreen washers4.55.77.3
Shock absorbers (front)3.15.55.5
Suspension arm ball joint (front)2.24.46.8
Headlight aim1.83.56.3

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

29in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

46in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

8in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2008 Mercedes-Benz A-Class follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Drive shaft joints and boots (front), about 15 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 57.5% of 5,851 first MOTs on the 2008 Mercedes-Benz A-Class passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 65.1%. Among 2,484 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Shock absorbers (front) appears more often than on similar cars (11.2% of those tests; 276 observed failures; about 5.3× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2008 Mercedes-Benz A-Class at the first attempt were Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (14.7%), Windscreen washers (12.8%) and Shock absorbers (front) (11.2%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Shock absorbers (front) (11.2% of those tests; 276 observed failures; about 5.3× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Shock absorbers (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (11.2% of those tests; 276 observed failures; about 5.3× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2008 Mercedes-Benz A-Class include Shock absorbers (front), Brake efficiency below minimum (roller test), Rigid brake pipes (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2008 Mercedes-Benz A-Class (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check