Mazda 3 2018: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 83 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2018 Mazda 3 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (rear).

Summary

A 2018 Mazda 3 passed first time about 2 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2017 and 2019 model years.

At a glance

How 6,846 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
83 in every 100
Did not pass first time
17 in every 1001,188 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
7 yearsabout 46,720 miles
First tests counted
6,846

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (rear)22 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre condition (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake pads (rear)13 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2018 Mazda 3 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Two faults and two wear patterns. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (front): 20 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,188 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 55 first tests20 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 95 first tests, 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 29 first tests9.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 65 first tests, 9.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 43 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 197 first tests, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 152 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar linkage (front): 16 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage (front)

Failed on 25 first tests16 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

An anti-roll bar linkage is graded Dangerous when a suspension component is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail. Insecure attachment that impairs directional stability is graded Dangerous too. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens the part is Major, and so is plain insecure attachment to the chassis or axle.

Coil spring (rear)

Failed on 256 first tests7.0 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: individual sidelight or tail light (front), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 34 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Wheel condition (front)

Noted on 27 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
83in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
2in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
15in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 82.6% of 6,846 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 85.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 2 fixed and the 15 not fixed make the 17 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol6,30145,484 miles8383
Diesel54567,693 miles8184

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020152018Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102018Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200452 in every 100527
200547 in every 1001,851
200650 in every 1002,787
200751 in every 1004,012
200850 in every 1005,080
200956 in every 1006,367
201057 in every 1007,309
201156 in every 1004,922
201263 in every 1004,536
201368 in every 1004,879
201470 in every 1007,914
201570 in every 10011,187
201673 in every 10010,120
201774 in every 1007,934
2018 This car83 in every 1006,846
201987 in every 1004,329
202087 in every 1004,157
202189 in every 1003,964
202292 in every 1002,415

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2018 Mazda 3.

Of 2018 Mazda 3 vehicles with under 32,000 miles, 86 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 65,000 miles or more, 81 in every 100 did.

Under 32,0001,437 tests
86
32,000–42,0001,307 tests
83
42,000–52,000 Typical car1,374 tests
82
52,000–65,0001,314 tests
82
65,000 and over1,413 tests
81

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 32,00042,000–52,00065,000 and over
Coil spring (rear)2.44.04.7
Tyre condition (front)2.12.12.1
Brake pads (rear)0.82.83.0
Tyre tread depth (front)0.31.01.2
Windscreen wipers1.10.70.6

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

58in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

16in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2018 Mazda 3 passed first time about 2 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2017 and 2019 model years. In 2025, 82.6% of 6,846 first MOTs on the 2018 Mazda 3 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 85.1%. Among 1,188 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Coil spring (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (21.5% of those tests; 256 observed failures; about 7.0× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2018 Mazda 3 at the first attempt were Coil spring (rear) (21.5%), Tyre condition (front) (14.1%) and Brake pads (rear) (12.8%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Coil spring (rear) (21.5% of those tests; 256 observed failures; about 7.0× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Coil spring (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (21.5% of those tests; 256 observed failures; about 7.0× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2018 Mazda 3 include Coil spring (rear), Rigid brake pipes (front), Anti-roll bar linkage (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2018 Mazda 3 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check