Mazda 2 2018: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 86 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2018 Mazda 2 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Brake pads (front).

Summary

The 2018 Mazda 2 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 7,889 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
86 in every 100
Did not pass first time
14 in every 1001,137 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
7 yearsabout 38,395 miles
First tests counted
7,889

What failed most often

  1. Brake pads (front)12 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre condition (front)8 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Windscreen wipers (front)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2018 Mazda 2 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (front): 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,137 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 36 first tests14 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 74 first tests, 11 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 35 first tests5.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: daytime running lights (front), 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Daytime running lights (front)

Failed on 24 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Daytime running lamps are inspected only when fitted as original equipment to cars and similar passenger vehicles first used on or after a set date. A lamp that is missing or not working, or that shows red light to the front, is Major. These lamps need not operate when the engine is not running, the parking brake is on, or park is selected on an automatic.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre tread depth (rear), 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 63 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Noted on 32 first tests5.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
86in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
3in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
11in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 85.6% of 7,889 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 89.0%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 3 fixed and the 11 not fixed make the 14 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020152018Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102018Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200455 in every 100635
200558 in every 100849
200656 in every 100977
200757 in every 1002,229
200850 in every 1006,549
200953 in every 10010,599
201054 in every 10011,103
201159 in every 1009,850
201261 in every 1008,360
201363 in every 1008,158
201467 in every 1008,119
201575 in every 1009,634
201678 in every 1009,742
201782 in every 1007,483
2018 This car86 in every 1007,889
201987 in every 1008,177
202090 in every 1004,036
202191 in every 1003,566
202293 in every 1005,054

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2018 Mazda 2.

Of 2018 Mazda 2 vehicles with under 24,000 miles, 91 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 56,000 miles or more, 78 in every 100 did.

Under 24,0001,601 tests
91
24,000–34,0001,625 tests
88
34,000–43,000 Typical car1,445 tests
87
43,000–56,0001,660 tests
84
56,000 and over1,554 tests
78

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 24,00034,000–43,00056,000 and over
Brake pads (front)1.11.72.3
Tyre condition (front)1.10.92.0
Windscreen wipers (front)0.80.91.3
Tyre tread depth (front)0.11.12.1
Headlight aim0.91.21.0

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

60in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

15in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

4in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2018 Mazda 2 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Brake pads (front), about 12 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 85.6% of 7,889 first MOTs on the 2018 Mazda 2 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 89.0%. Among 1,137 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Rigid brake pipes (front) appears more often than on similar cars (3.2% of those tests; 36 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2018 Mazda 2 at the first attempt were Brake pads (front) (11.5%), Tyre condition (front) (8.3%) and Windscreen wipers (front) (8.1%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Rigid brake pipes (front) (3.2% of those tests; 36 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Rigid brake pipes (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.2% of those tests; 36 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2018 Mazda 2 include Rigid brake pipes (front), Anti-lock braking system (ABS), Daytime running lights (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2018 Mazda 2 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check