Mazda 2 2017: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 82 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2017 Mazda 2 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (front).

Summary

The 2017 Mazda 2 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 7,483 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
82 in every 100
Did not pass first time
18 in every 1001,348 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
8 yearsabout 44,881 miles
First tests counted
7,483

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (front)18 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Brake pads (front)12 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre condition (front)7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2017 Mazda 2 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (front): 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,347 of 1,348 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 69 first tests14 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 124 first tests, 10 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pads (front)

Failed on 156 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt condition (rear), 6.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Seat belt condition (rear)

Failed on 58 first tests6.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Any sign of overstretching is a deficiency, and so is a cut anywhere on a child seat belt. On other belts the size of a cut decides it, with a stricter limit at the webbing edge than away from it. Webbing significantly stretched or weakened has rows in both Major and Dangerous grades.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the coil spring (front): 3.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 240 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 30 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Noted on 39 first tests6.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Noted on 48 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
82in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
14in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 82.0% of 7,483 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 85.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 14 not fixed make the 18 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020172020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020172020Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 85 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200455 in every 100635
200558 in every 100849
200656 in every 100977
200757 in every 1002,229
200850 in every 1006,549
200953 in every 10010,599
201054 in every 10011,103
201159 in every 1009,850
201261 in every 1008,360
201363 in every 1008,158
201467 in every 1008,119
201575 in every 1009,634
201678 in every 1009,742
2017 This car82 in every 1007,483
201886 in every 1007,889
201987 in every 1008,177
202090 in every 1004,036
202191 in every 1003,566
202293 in every 1005,054

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2017 Mazda 2.

Of 2017 Mazda 2 vehicles with under 28,000 miles, 89 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 65,000 miles or more, 74 in every 100 did.

Under 28,0001,495 tests
89
28,000–39,0001,465 tests
85
39,000–51,000 Typical car1,574 tests
81
51,000–65,0001,428 tests
81
65,000 and over1,519 tests
74

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 28,00039,000–51,00065,000 and over
Coil spring (front)1.64.04.9
Brake pads (front)1.62.32.6
Tyre condition (front)0.81.51.4
Windscreen washers0.51.22.0
Tyre tread depth (front)0.21.32.3

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

58in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

16in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

5in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2017 Mazda 2 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Coil spring (front), about 18 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 82.0% of 7,483 first MOTs on the 2017 Mazda 2 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 85.6%. Among 1,348 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Rigid brake pipes (front) appears more often than on similar cars (5.1% of those tests; 69 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2017 Mazda 2 at the first attempt were Coil spring (front) (17.8%), Brake pads (front) (11.6%) and Tyre condition (front) (7.0%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Rigid brake pipes (front) (5.1% of those tests; 69 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Rigid brake pipes (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (5.1% of those tests; 69 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2017 Mazda 2 include Rigid brake pipes (front), Seat belt condition (rear), Coil spring (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2017 Mazda 2 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check