Lexus IS 2014: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 85 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2014 Lexus IS were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (rear).

Summary

The 2014 Lexus IS follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,925 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
85 in every 100
Did not pass first time
15 in every 100447 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
11 yearsabout 91,065 miles
First tests counted
2,925

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (rear)18 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre pressure monitoring system11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2014 Lexus IS vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Tyres

Three wear patterns. The strongest is the tyre pressure monitoring system: 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 447 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Tyre pressure monitoring system

Failed on 50 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously inoperative is graded Major, and so is one listed as malfunctioning or obviously inoperative. The Minor row uses the word malfunctioning too, but its detail is a warning lamp indicating a fault, and it also covers a tyre that is obviously under-inflated.

Tyre condition (rear)

Failed on 81 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Exposed or damaged ply or cords are graded Dangerous. A cut in excess of the requirements and deep enough to reach the ply or cords is Major, and testers may open the cut with a blunt instrument to check its depth. A tyre contacting the vehicle through flexing or suspension movement is not a defect; fouling fails only at the time of test.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 36 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: headlight (front), 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Headlight (front)

Failed on 39 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On vehicles first used on or after a set date, a halogen headlamp unit converted to take HID or LED bulbs fails for light source and lamp not compatible, which is Major. A complete unit built with those light sources is not failed for that. The precise position of the lamps is not part of the inspection beyond a visual look to see that they sit at about the same height and distance from each side.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Visibility

One fault: windscreen wipers (front), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Windscreen wipers (front)

Failed on 25 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Only a clearly damaged or worn windscreen wiper needs to be rejected. A wiper that is missing or not working is graded Major, and so is a blade that is missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen. A defective blade is graded Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
85in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
3in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
12in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 84.7% of 2,925 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 88.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 3 fixed and the 12 not fixed make the 15 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005201020142020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000201020142020Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 84 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200065 in every 100305
200171 in every 100613
200266 in every 100864
200366 in every 1001,069
200465 in every 1001,218
200566 in every 1001,295
200669 in every 1002,272
200770 in every 1002,839
200874 in every 1002,328
200973 in every 1002,138
201075 in every 1002,076
201178 in every 1001,397
201282 in every 100855
201383 in every 1001,609
2014 This car85 in every 1002,925
201586 in every 1002,603
201685 in every 1001,827
201790 in every 1001,457
201891 in every 1001,338
201989 in every 1001,075
202092 in every 100516

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2014 Lexus IS.

Of 2014 Lexus IS vehicles with under 61,000 miles, 87 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 135,000 miles or more, 82 in every 100 did.

Under 61,000576 tests
87
61,000–80,000608 tests
88
80,000–102,000 Typical car575 tests
83
102,000–135,000581 tests
83
135,000 and over585 tests
82

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 61,00080,000–102,000135,000 and over
Tyre condition (rear)3.03.03.2
Tyre pressure monitoring system1.92.11.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

52in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

22in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

5in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2014 Lexus IS follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (rear), about 18 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 84.7% of 2,925 first MOTs on the 2014 Lexus IS passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 88.2%. Among 447 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Headlight (front) appears more often than on similar cars (8.7% of those tests; 39 observed failures; about 2.3× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2014 Lexus IS at the first attempt were Tyre condition (rear) (18.1%) and Tyre pressure monitoring system (11.2%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Headlight (front) (8.7% of those tests; 39 observed failures; about 2.3× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Headlight (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (8.7% of those tests; 39 observed failures; about 2.3× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2014 Lexus IS include Headlight (front), Windscreen wipers (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2014 Lexus IS (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check