Land Rover Range Rover 2010: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 73 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2010 Land Rover Range Rover were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension arm pins and bushes (front).

Summary

The 2010 Land Rover Range Rover follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 3,036 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
73 in every 100
Did not pass first time
27 in every 100809 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
15 yearsabout 121,686 miles
First tests counted
3,036

What failed most often

  1. Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)17 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Suspension arm ball joint (front)15 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)12 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2010 Land Rover Range Rover vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Three faults. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (rear): 6.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 809 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Rigid brake pipes (rear)

Failed on 80 first tests6.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 114 first tests, 3.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 42 first tests6.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 87 first tests, 4.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake performance not tested

Failed on 23 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A brake performance test recorded as unable to be tested is Major. DVSA says the result must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason has to go in the additional information box.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the suspension arm pins and bushes (front): 3.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 136 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 22 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 80 first tests, 3.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm ball joint (front)

Failed on 121 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: drive shaft joints and boots (front), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 100 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 71 first tests32 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Shock absorbers (rear)

Noted on 67 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Noted on 113 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
73in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
3in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
24in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 73.4% of 3,036 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 76.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 3 fixed and the 24 not fixed make the 27 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as tested
Diesel2,733123,435 miles73
Petrol30397,865 miles79

Figures are in every 100 first tests.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100200020102020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 74 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199669 in every 100319
199773 in every 100431
199870 in every 100495
199969 in every 100553
200072 in every 100796
200174 in every 1001,026
200271 in every 100997
200370 in every 1001,499
200468 in every 1001,986
200569 in every 1002,186
200667 in every 1002,624
200769 in every 1003,061
200870 in every 1002,178
200971 in every 1002,343
2010 This car73 in every 1003,036
201173 in every 1003,491
201274 in every 1004,206
201378 in every 1008,552
201483 in every 1005,380
201582 in every 1005,778
201681 in every 1005,063
201784 in every 1005,083
201888 in every 1004,975
201988 in every 1004,454
202088 in every 1003,349
202189 in every 1003,800
202290 in every 1003,827

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2010 Range Rover.

Of 2010 Range Rover vehicles with under 94,000 miles, 78 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 150,000 miles or more, 68 in every 100 did.

Under 94,000604 tests
78
94,000–113,000595 tests
75
113,000–130,000 Typical car612 tests
73
130,000–150,000611 tests
73
150,000 and over612 tests
68

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 94,000113,000–130,000150,000 and over
Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)2.03.66.4
Suspension arm ball joint (front)2.63.64.1
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)3.02.03.8
Rigid brake pipes (rear)2.23.63.4
Tyre condition (front)1.32.52.6

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

33in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

40in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2010 Land Rover Range Rover follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Suspension arm pins and bushes (front), about 17 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 73.4% of 3,036 first MOTs on the 2010 Land Rover Range Rover passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 76.2%. Among 809 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Rigid brake pipes (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (9.9% of those tests; 80 observed failures; about 6.0× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2010 Land Rover Range Rover at the first attempt were Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) (16.8%), Suspension arm ball joint (front) (15.0%) and Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (12.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Rigid brake pipes (rear) (9.9% of those tests; 80 observed failures; about 6.0× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Rigid brake pipes (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (9.9% of those tests; 80 observed failures; about 6.0× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2010 Land Rover Range Rover include Rigid brake pipes (rear), Brake performance not tested, Suspension arm pins and bushes (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check