Model Reports 5 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Land Rover Freelander 2007: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 59 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2007 Land Rover Freelander were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

A 2007 Land Rover Freelander passed first time about 3 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2006 and 2008 model years.

At a glance

How 11,611 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
59 in every 100
Did not pass first time
41 in every 1004,792 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
18 yearsabout 143,144 miles
First tests counted
11,611

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)9 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Track rod end (front)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2007 Land Rover Freelander vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

One fault: handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test), 21 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 4,786 of 4,792 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test)

Failed on 402 first tests21 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is graded Major, and efficiency less than half of the required value is graded Dangerous. This check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake has not already been tested as the secondary brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the suspension sub-frame (rear): 13 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Failed on 233 first tests13 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A suspension sub-frame insecurely attached to the chassis or axle is Major, and Dangerous when it is insecure and impairing directional stability. A sub-frame that is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail is also Dangerous. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens it is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 829 first tests, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear)

Failed on 238 first tests6.7 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 188 first tests, 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Failed on 338 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: drive shaft joints and boots (rear), 11 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (rear)

Failed on 128 first tests11 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt mounting area (rear), 4.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Seat belt mounting area (rear)

Failed on 116 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A seat belt anchorage likely to become detached in the event of a collision is graded Dangerous. The load bearing structure near an anchorage, called a prescribed area, is Major when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Anchorage points are inspected for all seat belts fitted, except a belt with no corresponding seat.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 34 first tests, 3.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Steering

One fault: steering rack (front), 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Steering rack (front)

Failed on 118 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Steering gear casing retaining devices dangerously loose, or visible relative movement to the chassis or bodywork, is graded Dangerous. A casing not properly attached, or fractured, is Major, but a fracture that affects the stability or attachment of the casing is Dangerous. A gaiter damaged but still keeping dirt out is Minor, and Major once missing or no longer doing so.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the individual direction indicators (front): 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (front)

Failed on 130 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 182 first tests, 4.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 202 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 169 first tests, 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Brake cable (rear)

Noted on 119 first tests16 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

All direction indicators

Noted on 20 first tests8.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks (rear)

Noted on 78 first tests8.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Power steering pipes and hoses (front)

Noted on 117 first tests5.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Structural sub-frame condition (rear)

Noted on 66 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
59in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
6in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
35in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 58.7% of 11,611 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 65.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 6 fixed and the 35 not fixed make the 41 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100200020072010Older carsNewer cars
406080100200020072010Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200057 in every 100311
200153 in every 100806
200254 in every 1001,590
200353 in every 1002,128
200452 in every 1003,403
200550 in every 1004,169
200652 in every 1004,699
2007 This car59 in every 10011,611
200859 in every 1009,318
200963 in every 1008,950
201064 in every 10012,962
201168 in every 10011,546
201271 in every 1009,941
201373 in every 10012,621
201477 in every 10011,171

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2007 Freelander.

Of 2007 Freelander vehicles with under 112,000 miles, 68 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 176,000 miles or more, 55 in every 100 did.

Under 112,0002,328 tests
68
112,000–134,0002,263 tests
60
134,000–153,000 Typical car2,320 tests
57
153,000–176,0002,390 tests
54
176,000 and over2,300 tests
55

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 112,000134,000–153,000176,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.34.86.1
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)2.24.14.2
Track rod end (front)1.53.94.9
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test)2.14.13.2
Coil spring (front)2.33.83.7

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

25in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

51in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2007 Land Rover Freelander passed first time about 3 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2006 and 2008 model years. In 2025, 58.7% of 11,611 first MOTs on the 2007 Land Rover Freelander passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 65.4%. Among 4,792 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test) appears more often than on similar cars (8.4% of those tests; 402 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2007 Land Rover Freelander at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (11.0%), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (8.9%) and Track rod end (front) (8.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test) (8.4% of those tests; 402 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test) shows up more often than on similar cars (8.4% of those tests; 402 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2007 Land Rover Freelander include Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test), Suspension sub-frame (rear), Drive shaft joints and boots (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2007 Land Rover Freelander (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check