Land Rover Freelander 2003: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 53 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2003 Land Rover Freelander were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Number plate lights.

Summary

The 2003 Land Rover Freelander follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,128 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
53 in every 100
Did not pass first time
47 in every 100998 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
22 yearsabout 130,049 miles
First tests counted
2,128

What failed most often

  1. Number plate lights11 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Brake light10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Suspension mounting area (rear)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2003 Land Rover Freelander vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the suspension arm (front): 19 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 995 of 998 failed first attempts (99.7%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm (front)

Failed on 62 first tests19 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 84 first tests, 4.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint (front)

Failed on 25 first tests3.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On an anti-roll bar ball joint, DVSA fails a suspension pin, bush or joint that is excessively worn as Major. One likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Failed on 84 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Three faults. The strongest is the handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test): 12 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test)

Failed on 49 first tests12 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is graded Major, and efficiency less than half of the required value is graded Dangerous. This check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake has not already been tested as the secondary brake.

Brake pedal

Failed on 29 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A brake pedal rubber worn smooth is not a defect, and nor is a worn design pattern on an aftermarket rubber. A pedal with no rubber is rejected if its grooves or raised grip sections are worn smooth, unless the vehicle was made without them. Insufficient reserve travel is Major, but a vehicle is failed for it only if the pedal or lever is touching the floor or handlebar.

Brake performance not tested

Failed on 29 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A brake performance test recorded as unable to be tested is Major. DVSA says the result must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason has to go in the additional information box.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults. The strongest is the battery: 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Battery

Failed on 21 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A battery that is insecure but not likely to fall from its carrier is Minor. It is Major if insecure and likely to fall from the carrier or cause a short circuit, and also Major if it is leaking. Electric and hybrid vehicles are included, though propulsion batteries are unlikely to be accessible and are assessed visually only if they are.

Horn

Failed on 53 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A horn that does not work, or is likely to be confused with an emergency vehicle siren, is graded Major. Gongs, bells, sirens and anything with more than one tone, which includes a horn that alternates between its notes, are not allowed, except a gong, bell or siren on vehicles first used before a set date. Sound defects are Minor for named cases such as a bell or harsh sound, and Major under a general row.

Number plate lights (rear)

Failed on 113 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Registration plate lamps must light up the rear registration plate and operate at the same time as the position lamps. A missing or inoperative lamp is Major when the plate has only one lamp or all its lamps are not working, and Minor when the plate has several lamps or light sources and not all have failed. A lamp throwing direct white light to the rear is also Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel emissions not tested, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions not tested

Failed on 21 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

An emissions test on a diesel that is unable to be completed is graded Major. The failure wording 'not tested' carries the same Major grade.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Transmission oil leaks (rear)

Noted on 20 first tests7.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Noted on 22 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Noted on 192 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Track rod end (front)

Noted on 47 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
53in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
39in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 53.1% of 2,128 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 61.0%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 39 not fixed make the 47 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as tested
Diesel1,740135,511 miles53
Petrol385106,570 miles52

Figures are in every 100 first tests.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100200020032010Older carsNewer cars
406080100200020032010Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 51 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200057 in every 100311
200153 in every 100806
200254 in every 1001,590
2003 This car53 in every 1002,128
200452 in every 1003,403
200550 in every 1004,169
200652 in every 1004,699
200759 in every 10011,611
200859 in every 1009,318
200963 in every 1008,950
201064 in every 10012,962
201168 in every 10011,546
201271 in every 1009,941
201373 in every 10012,621
201477 in every 10011,171

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2003 Freelander.

Of 2003 Freelander vehicles with under 96,000 miles, 58 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 165,000 miles or more, 50 in every 100 did.

Under 96,000433 tests
58
96,000–119,000417 tests
52
119,000–141,000 Typical car426 tests
53
141,000–165,000423 tests
52
165,000 and over424 tests
50

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 96,000119,000–141,000165,000 and over
Number plate lights5.54.55.4
Brake light3.23.36.4
Suspension mounting area (rear)3.03.55.0
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.54.75.7
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)1.84.75.2

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

17in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

65in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

11in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2003 Land Rover Freelander follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Number plate lights, about 11 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 53.1% of 2,128 first MOTs on the 2003 Land Rover Freelander passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 61.0%. Among 998 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm (front) appears more often than on similar cars (6.2% of those tests; 62 observed failures; about 19× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2003 Land Rover Freelander at the first attempt were Number plate lights (11.4%), Brake light (10.2%) and Suspension mounting area (rear) (9.2%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm (front) (6.2% of those tests; 62 observed failures; about 19× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (6.2% of those tests; 62 observed failures; about 19× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2003 Land Rover Freelander include Suspension arm (front), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (decelerometer test), Brake pedal. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2003 Land Rover Freelander (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check