Model Reports 4 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Land Rover Defender 2002: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 65 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2002 Land Rover Defender were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Headlight aim.

Summary

The 2002 Land Rover Defender follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 3,505 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
65 in every 100
Did not pass first time
35 in every 1001,220 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
23 yearsabout 128,550 miles
First tests counted
3,505

What failed most often

  1. Headlight aim11 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Shock absorbers (rear)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Windscreen washers9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2002 Land Rover Defender vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Steering

Two faults. The strongest is the steering drag link end (front): 55 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,220 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Steering drag link end (front)

Failed on 43 first tests55 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is Major, and one worn to the extent there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. Track rod or drag link ends that are seriously misaligned are Major. An unsafe modification to the steering linkage is Major, and Dangerous where the steering is affected.

Steering ball joint (front)

Failed on 46 first tests14 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is graded Major, and one worn to the extent that there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. Movement from excessive wear is distinguished from built-in clearance or spring loading of a joint. A dust cover that is damaged but still keeps dirt out is Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the suspension arm ball joint dust cover (rear): 48 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (rear)

Failed on 42 first tests48 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Whether a suspension arm ball joint dust cover still keeps dirt out decides its grade. Severely deteriorated is Minor, while missing, or no longer preventing the ingress of dirt, is Major.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Failed on 119 first tests4.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 123 first tests, 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Wheel bearings (front)

Failed on 51 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive play in a wheel bearing, or a bearing that is excessively rough, is Major. Play so excessive that the bearing is likely to break up or directional control is impaired is Dangerous, and so is a bearing so rough that it is likely to overheat or break up.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 106 first tests, 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

Three faults. The strongest is the vehicle structure around towbar mounting (rear): 21 times as often as on similar cars.

Vehicle structure around towbar mounting (rear)

Failed on 53 first tests21 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Under the manual, towbar mounting points are not prescribed areas, so the vehicle structure near them is rejected only if its strength or continuity is significantly reduced. Corrosion, a fracture or excessive damage within a set distance of the mounting is graded Major. Structure so weakened that the towbar is likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Fuel system

Failed on 32 first tests8.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A fuel tank with a hole, or a split filler neck, from which fuel can leak must be failed for leaking even if the hole or split is above the fuel line. A leaking fuel system is Major, and graded Dangerous where it leaks excessively or there is a risk of fire. Any defective part of an LPG, CNG, LNG or hydrogen system is also graded Dangerous.

Chassis condition (rear)

Failed on 87 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A main load-bearing structural member that is fractured, deformed, modified or inadequately repaired is Major when structural rigidity is significantly reduced, and Dangerous where steering or braking is likely to be adversely affected. Corrosion of the body, cab or chassis at a mounting point is Dangerous where overall security or stability is impaired.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 76 first tests, 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt condition (front), 7.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Seat belt condition (front)

Failed on 55 first tests7.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Any sign of overstretching is a deficiency, and so is a cut anywhere on a child seat belt. On other belts the size of a cut decides it, with a stricter limit at the webbing edge than away from it. Webbing significantly stretched or weakened has rows in both Major and Dangerous grades.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 202 first tests, 9.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel emissions test (pre-reg turbo rules before 01/07/2008), 4.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (pre-reg turbo rules before 01/07/2008)

Failed on 86 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Swivel pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 34 first tests60 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Propeller shaft joints (rear)

Noted on 25 first tests45 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Steering box

Noted on 38 first tests36 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Steering box play

Noted on 31 first tests13 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks

Noted on 87 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
65in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
30in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 65.2% of 3,505 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 70.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 30 not fixed make the 35 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801001985199019952002200520102015Older carsNewer cars
406080100199020022010Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 64 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
198472 in every 100425
198571 in every 1001,186
198668 in every 1001,630
198767 in every 1001,517
198865 in every 1001,395
198968 in every 1001,750
199068 in every 1001,520
199165 in every 1001,585
199265 in every 1001,367
199366 in every 1001,673
199463 in every 1002,099
199564 in every 1002,615
199665 in every 1003,132
199766 in every 1003,075
199864 in every 1003,149
199964 in every 1002,695
200064 in every 1002,705
200164 in every 1002,819
2002 This car65 in every 1003,505
200365 in every 1004,027
200464 in every 1003,936
200566 in every 1003,841
200666 in every 1003,488
200766 in every 1003,638
200868 in every 1003,433
200968 in every 1003,179
201068 in every 1003,642
201169 in every 1003,708
201271 in every 1003,640
201372 in every 1004,093
201476 in every 1005,513
201579 in every 1006,269
201683 in every 1001,702

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2002 Defender.

Of 2002 Defender vehicles with under 92,000 miles, 68 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 173,000 miles or more, 64 in every 100 did.

Under 92,000687 tests
68
92,000–118,000725 tests
62
118,000–142,000 Typical car682 tests
67
142,000–173,000702 tests
66
173,000 and over709 tests
64

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 92,000118,000–142,000173,000 and over
Headlight aim2.94.33.8
Shock absorbers (rear)2.04.03.1
Windscreen washers1.33.84.4
Track rod end (front)2.92.82.8
Chassis condition (rear)1.52.33.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

21in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

57in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2002 Land Rover Defender follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Headlight aim, about 11 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 65.2% of 3,505 first MOTs on the 2002 Land Rover Defender passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 70.2%. Among 1,220 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Steering drag link end (front) appears more often than on similar cars (3.5% of those tests; 43 observed failures; about 55× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2002 Land Rover Defender at the first attempt were Headlight aim (10.7%), Shock absorbers (rear) (9.8%) and Windscreen washers (9.1%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Steering drag link end (front) (3.5% of those tests; 43 observed failures; about 55× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Steering drag link end (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.5% of those tests; 43 observed failures; about 55× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2002 Land Rover Defender include Steering drag link end (front), Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (rear), Vehicle structure around towbar mounting (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2002 Land Rover Defender (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check