Model Reports 5 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Kia Sportage 2014: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 68 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2014 Kia Sportage were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test).

Summary

At the same mileage, a diesel 2014 Kia Sportage passed first time more often than a petrol one: 69 in every 100 against 64 in every 100.

At a glance

How 17,894 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
68 in every 100
Did not pass first time
32 in every 1005,682 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
11 yearsabout 86,909 miles
First tests counted
17,894

What failed most often

  1. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)13 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre pressure monitoring system10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Track rod end (front)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2014 Kia Sportage vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm pins and bushes (rear), 5.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 5,677 of 5,682 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 193 first tests5.1 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 353 first tests, 4.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Five faults and two wear patterns. The strongest is the brake efficiency below minimum (roller test): 4.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 122 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Service brake efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and efficiency less than half of the required value is graded Dangerous. On a roller brake tester, if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock, the efficiency requirement for that system counts as met.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 167 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 761 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 241 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 876 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 149 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake that is inoperative on one side is Major. When tested on the road, the failure is the vehicle deviating excessively from a straight line. Vehicles whose parking brake was already tested as the secondary brake are not tested again for this.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 315 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Brake pads (front)

Failed on 411 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre pressure monitoring system, 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre pressure monitoring system

Failed on 570 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously inoperative is graded Major, and so is one listed as malfunctioning or obviously inoperative. The Minor row uses the word malfunctioning too, but its detail is a warning lamp indicating a fault, and it also covers a tyre that is obviously under-inflated.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: side repeater indicators, 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 163 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 25 first tests, 3.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Transmission oil leaks (rear)

Noted on 26 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Noted on 183 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Handbrake efficiency on trikes, quads and pre-1968 vehicles (roller test)

Noted on 20 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake pedal

Noted on 53 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
68in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
27in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 68.2% of 17,894 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 73.1%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 27 not fixed make the 32 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel14,97489,044 miles6869
Petrol2,92076,651 miles6764

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020142020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020142020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 71 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200549 in every 100781
200650 in every 100741
200749 in every 100858
200854 in every 1001,057
200954 in every 1001,731
201056 in every 1003,425
201158 in every 1006,761
201259 in every 10011,560
201361 in every 10016,520
2014 This car68 in every 10017,894
201571 in every 10019,807
201675 in every 10035,201
201779 in every 10034,934
201882 in every 10032,321
201983 in every 10031,668
202083 in every 10018,121
202185 in every 10025,840
202289 in every 10027,880

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2014 Sportage.

Of 2014 Sportage vehicles with under 66,000 miles, 80 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 110,000 miles or more, 60 in every 100 did.

Under 66,0003,602 tests
80
66,000–80,0003,480 tests
71
80,000–93,000 Typical car3,525 tests
67
93,000–110,0003,661 tests
64
110,000 and over3,617 tests
60

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested		Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel89,044 miles6869
Petrol76,651 miles6764

Figures are in every 100 first tests. At the same mileage, diesel passed more often (69 against 64 in every 100).

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 66,00080,000–93,000110,000 and over
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.84.36.6
Tyre pressure monitoring system2.13.23.9
Track rod end (front)1.93.44.5
Tyre tread depth (front)1.42.93.5
Brake pads (front)1.82.03.0

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

39in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

33in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

At the same mileage, a diesel 2014 Kia Sportage passed first time more often than a petrol one: 69 in every 100 against 64 in every 100. In 2025, 68.2% of 17,894 first MOTs on the 2014 Kia Sportage passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 73.1%. Among 5,682 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (3.4% of those tests; 193 observed failures; about 5.1× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2014 Kia Sportage at the first attempt were Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (13.4%), Tyre pressure monitoring system (10.0%) and Track rod end (front) (10.0%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear) (3.4% of those tests; 193 observed failures; about 5.1× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.4% of those tests; 193 observed failures; about 5.1× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2014 Kia Sportage include Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear), Brake efficiency below minimum (roller test), Handbrake lever. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2014 Kia Sportage (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check