Kia Rio 2013: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 61 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2013 Kia Rio were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Airbag warning light.

Summary

The 2013 Kia Rio follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 9,193 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
61 in every 100
Did not pass first time
39 in every 1003,589 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
12 yearsabout 78,798 miles
First tests counted
9,193

What failed most often

  1. Airbag warning light10 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Suspension arm ball joint (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2013 Kia Rio vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 7.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 3,587 of 3,589 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 359 first tests7.7 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front), 5.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 325 first tests5.2 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Whether a suspension arm ball joint dust cover still keeps dirt out decides its grade. Severely deteriorated is Minor, while missing, or no longer preventing the ingress of dirt, is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: side repeater indicators, 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 161 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 26 first tests, 4.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the brake discs (rear): 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 127 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 511 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 342 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Brake pedal

Noted on 41 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Noted on 306 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
61in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
7in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
32in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 61.0% of 9,193 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 68.0%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 7 fixed and the 32 not fixed make the 39 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol6,73073,420 miles6362
Diesel2,46295,810 miles5660

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020132020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020132020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 62 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200548 in every 100347
200651 in every 100697
200754 in every 100889
200851 in every 1001,598
200954 in every 1004,030
201055 in every 1005,250
201154 in every 1006,114
201259 in every 1008,171
2013 This car61 in every 1009,193
201466 in every 10010,368
201574 in every 10010,904
201676 in every 1008,528
201781 in every 1007,787
201885 in every 1005,571
201984 in every 1004,705
202085 in every 1003,285
202187 in every 1003,559
202291 in every 1004,410

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2013 Kia Rio.

Of 2013 Kia Rio vehicles with under 54,000 miles, 73 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 105,000 miles or more, 53 in every 100 did.

Under 54,0001,807 tests
73
54,000–71,0001,850 tests
64
71,000–86,000 Typical car1,843 tests
60
86,000–105,0001,861 tests
55
105,000 and over1,829 tests
53

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol73,420 miles6362
Diesel95,810 miles5660

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 95,810 against 73,420). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 54,00071,000–86,000105,000 and over
Airbag warning light1.74.46.2
Suspension arm ball joint (front)1.04.16.3
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.54.25.5
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front)4.93.32.0
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.14.04.3

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

35in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

38in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2013 Kia Rio follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Airbag warning light, about 10 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 61.0% of 9,193 first MOTs on the 2013 Kia Rio passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 68.0%. Among 3,589 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Airbag warning light appears more often than on similar cars (10.0% of those tests; 359 observed failures; about 7.7× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2013 Kia Rio at the first attempt were Airbag warning light (10.0%), Suspension arm ball joint (front) (9.9%) and Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (9.5%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Airbag warning light (10.0% of those tests; 359 observed failures; about 7.7× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Airbag warning light shows up more often than on similar cars (10.0% of those tests; 359 observed failures; about 7.7× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2013 Kia Rio include Airbag warning light, Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front), Side repeater indicators. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2013 Kia Rio (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check