Kia Picanto 2005: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 48 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2005 Kia Picanto were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test).

Summary

The 2005 Kia Picanto follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,649 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
48 in every 100
Did not pass first time
52 in every 1001,367 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
20 yearsabout 71,437 miles
First tests counted
2,649

What failed most often

  1. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)24 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)18 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Petrol emissions (with catalyst)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2005 Kia Picanto vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Three faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the handbrake performance (roller test, rear): 4.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,366 of 1,367 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Handbrake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 49 first tests4.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake that is inoperative on one side is Major. When tested on the road, the failure is the vehicle deviating excessively from a straight line. Vehicles whose parking brake was already tested as the secondary brake are not tested again for this.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 333 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Brake performance (roller test, front)

Failed on 74 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 96 first tests, 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 28 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 161 first tests, 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: chassis condition (rear), 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Chassis condition (rear)

Failed on 43 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A main load-bearing structural member that is fractured, deformed, modified or inadequately repaired is Major when structural rigidity is significantly reduced, and Dangerous where steering or braking is likely to be adversely affected. Corrosion of the body, cab or chassis at a mounting point is Dangerous where overall security or stability is impaired.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

One fault: suspension mounting area (rear), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Failed on 127 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the individual sidelight or tail light (front): 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 242 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Number plate lights (rear)

Failed on 45 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Registration plate lamps must light up the rear registration plate and operate at the same time as the position lamps. A missing or inoperative lamp is Major when the plate has only one lamp or all its lamps are not working, and Minor when the plate has several lamps or light sources and not all have failed. A lamp throwing direct white light to the rear is also Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Macpherson strut pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 111 first tests8.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Brake pedal

Noted on 20 first tests4.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Side repeater indicators

Noted on 21 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring (rear)

Noted on 292 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Seat belt condition (front)

Noted on 26 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Engine oil leaks (front)

Noted on 51 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
48in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
44in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 48.4% of 2,649 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 55.9%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 44 not fixed make the 52 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020152020Newer cars
406080100200520102020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 49 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200449 in every 1001,285
2005 This car48 in every 1002,649
200647 in every 1002,930
200750 in every 1002,119
200852 in every 1002,695
200954 in every 10011,352
201055 in every 10011,799
201157 in every 1009,733
201259 in every 10012,293
201364 in every 10012,004
201469 in every 10013,850
201574 in every 10013,160
201675 in every 10012,159
201780 in every 10012,878
201883 in every 10015,887
201984 in every 10017,030
202086 in every 1008,674
202186 in every 10010,577
202288 in every 1009,845

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2005 Picanto.

Of 2005 Picanto vehicles with under 48,000 miles, 60 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 97,000 miles or more, 37 in every 100 did.

Under 48,000533 tests
60
48,000–64,000530 tests
55
64,000–79,000 Typical car547 tests
46
79,000–97,000513 tests
42
97,000 and over524 tests
37

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 48,00064,000–79,00097,000 and over
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)7.512.119.1
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)4.19.913.4
Petrol emissions (with catalyst)1.54.69.4
Suspension mounting area (rear)1.14.29.2
Tyre condition (front)4.35.35.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

18in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

59in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

15in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2005 Kia Picanto follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test), about 24 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 48.4% of 2,649 first MOTs on the 2005 Kia Picanto passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 55.9%. Among 1,367 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Handbrake performance (roller test, rear) appears more often than on similar cars (3.6% of those tests; 49 observed failures; about 4.0× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2005 Kia Picanto at the first attempt were Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (24.4%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (17.7%) and Petrol emissions (with catalyst) (9.7%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Handbrake performance (roller test, rear) (3.6% of those tests; 49 observed failures; about 4.0× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Handbrake performance (roller test, rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.6% of those tests; 49 observed failures; about 4.0× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2005 Kia Picanto include Handbrake performance (roller test, rear), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test), Chassis condition (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2005 Kia Picanto (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check