Kia Ceed 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 71 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2015 Kia Ceed were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension arm pins and bushes (front).

Summary

A 2015 Kia Ceed passed first time about 2 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2014 and 2016 model years.

At a glance

How 10,689 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
71 in every 100
Did not pass first time
29 in every 1003,137 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
10 yearsabout 77,865 miles
First tests counted
10,689

What failed most often

  1. Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake performance (roller test, front)7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2015 Kia Ceed vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the brake performance (roller test, front): 6.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 3,134 of 3,137 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Brake performance (roller test, front)

Failed on 234 first tests6.2 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 156 first tests, 3.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 321 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the suspension arm pins and bushes (rear): 5.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 88 first tests5.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 264 first tests, 7.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 427 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the rear fog light: 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Rear fog light

Failed on 91 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.

Headlight aim not tested

Failed on 35 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Headlamp aim recorded as not tested, or unable to be tested, is a Major failure. These results must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason must be included in the additional information box.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Brake performance (plate test, front)

Noted on 41 first tests9.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Suspension arm (rear)

Noted on 84 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
71in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
24in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 70.7% of 10,689 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 75.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 24 not fixed make the 29 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel6,69085,540 miles6970
Petrol3,99967,576 miles7371

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020152020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 72 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200750 in every 1001,903
200848 in every 1003,559
200951 in every 1005,789
201050 in every 1006,630
201150 in every 1006,260
201255 in every 10010,601
201361 in every 10010,238
201463 in every 10010,448
2015 This car71 in every 10010,689
201674 in every 1009,185
201777 in every 1008,177
201880 in every 1008,811
201983 in every 1009,533
202083 in every 1004,078
202184 in every 1004,937
202287 in every 1006,207

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2015 Ceed.

Of 2015 Ceed vehicles with under 54,000 miles, 79 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 106,000 miles or more, 64 in every 100 did.

Under 54,0002,096 tests
79
54,000–71,0002,196 tests
74
71,000–86,000 Typical car2,137 tests
70
86,000–106,0002,116 tests
67
106,000 and over2,140 tests
64

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel85,540 miles6970
Petrol67,576 miles7371

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 85,540 against 67,576). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 54,00071,000–86,000106,000 and over
Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)3.34.34.6
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.23.04.5
Brake performance (roller test, front)2.52.21.9
Tyre tread depth (front)1.02.13.1
Windscreen washers1.22.22.3

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

46in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

26in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

8in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2015 Kia Ceed passed first time about 2 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2014 and 2016 model years. In 2025, 70.7% of 10,689 first MOTs on the 2015 Kia Ceed passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 75.6%. Among 3,137 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Brake performance (roller test, front) appears more often than on similar cars (7.5% of those tests; 234 observed failures; about 6.2× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2015 Kia Ceed at the first attempt were Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) (13.6%), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (10.2%) and Brake performance (roller test, front) (7.5%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Brake performance (roller test, front) (7.5% of those tests; 234 observed failures; about 6.2× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Brake performance (roller test, front) shows up more often than on similar cars (7.5% of those tests; 234 observed failures; about 6.2× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Kia Ceed include Brake performance (roller test, front), Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear), Rear fog light. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Kia Ceed (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check