Model Reports 5 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Kia Ceed 2008: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 48 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2008 Kia Ceed were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

A 2008 Kia Ceed passed first time about 3 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2007 and 2009 model years.

At a glance

How 3,559 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
48 in every 100
Did not pass first time
52 in every 1001,865 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
17 yearsabout 105,354 miles
First tests counted
3,559

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)21 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)13 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Suspension arm ball joint (front)12 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2008 Kia Ceed vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Five faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear): 8.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,865 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear)

Failed on 78 first tests8.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 127 first tests, 8.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Other suspension component ball joint (front)

Failed on 46 first tests7.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Under DVSA's general suspension wording, a ball joint that is excessively worn is Major. One likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Suspension arm (rear)

Failed on 59 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 186 first tests, 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint (front)

Failed on 45 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On an anti-roll bar ball joint, DVSA fails a suspension pin, bush or joint that is excessively worn as Major. One likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Failed on 137 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 91 first tests, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Four faults and one wear pattern. The strongest is the brake hand lever: 5.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake hand lever

Failed on 58 first tests5.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A brake lever is failed for insufficient reserve only if it is touching the floor or handlebar. On motorcycle derived systems the lever may touch the handlebar, so the extent of reserve travel is assessed during the brake test. A lever not releasing correctly is Minor, and Major where the functionality of the brakes is affected.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 81 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 65 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 284 first tests, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 51 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake that is inoperative on one side is Major. When tested on the road, the failure is the vehicle deviating excessively from a straight line. Vehicles whose parking brake was already tested as the secondary brake are not tested again for this.

Brake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 108 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A wheel with no recorded braking effort on the roller test is graded Dangerous. Inadequate effort, a brake grabbing severely, abnormal lag and excessive fluctuation in effort are each Major. So is significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied, which indicates a binding brake.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 127 first tests, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: exhaust system (front), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system (front)

Failed on 41 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Side repeater indicators (front)

Noted on 63 first tests18 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar ball joint (rear)

Noted on 25 first tests8.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Steering rack play

Noted on 41 first tests6.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 185 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake performance (plate test, rear)

Noted on 35 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
48in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
11in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
41in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 47.6% of 3,559 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 58.8%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 11 fixed and the 41 not fixed make the 52 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol2,15097,398 miles4847
Diesel1,408119,993 miles4648

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100200820152020Newer cars
40608010020082020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 49 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200750 in every 1001,903
2008 This car48 in every 1003,559
200951 in every 1005,789
201050 in every 1006,630
201150 in every 1006,260
201255 in every 10010,601
201361 in every 10010,238
201463 in every 10010,448
201571 in every 10010,689
201674 in every 1009,185
201777 in every 1008,177
201880 in every 1008,811
201983 in every 1009,533
202083 in every 1004,078
202184 in every 1004,937
202287 in every 1006,207

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2008 Ceed.

Of 2008 Ceed vehicles with under 77,000 miles, 61 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 137,000 miles or more, 40 in every 100 did.

Under 77,000720 tests
61
77,000–97,000707 tests
50
97,000–114,000 Typical car695 tests
46
114,000–137,000722 tests
42
137,000 and over715 tests
40

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested		Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol97,398 miles4847
Diesel119,993 miles4648

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 119,993 against 97,398). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 77,00097,000–114,000137,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)4.914.514.7
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)2.47.512.0
Suspension arm ball joint (front)2.65.99.5
Headlight aim2.46.38.5
Brake light5.06.05.3

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

18in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

61in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

15in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2008 Kia Ceed passed first time about 3 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2007 and 2009 model years. In 2025, 47.6% of 3,559 first MOTs on the 2008 Kia Ceed passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 58.8%. Among 1,865 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (4.2% of those tests; 78 observed failures; about 8.9× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2008 Kia Ceed at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (21.1%), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (12.7%) and Suspension arm ball joint (front) (11.6%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear) (4.2% of those tests; 78 observed failures; about 8.9× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (4.2% of those tests; 78 observed failures; about 8.9× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2008 Kia Ceed include Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear), Other suspension component ball joint (front), Brake hand lever. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2008 Kia Ceed (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check