Jaguar X-Type 2006: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 58 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2006 Jaguar X-Type were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension mounting area (rear).

Summary

The 2006 Jaguar X-Type follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,300 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
58 in every 100
Did not pass first time
42 in every 100964 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
19 yearsabout 104,980 miles
First tests counted
2,300

What failed most often

  1. Suspension mounting area (rear)15 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre condition (front)9 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Petrol engine warning light8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2006 Jaguar X-Type vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the hydraulic brake callipers (rear): 13 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 962 of 964 failed first attempts (99.8%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Hydraulic brake callipers (rear)

Failed on 28 first tests13 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A cracked, damaged, leaking or insecurely mounted calliper is Major while braking performance is not affected, and graded Dangerous once it is. Excessive corrosion is Major, and excessively corroded and likely to crack is graded Dangerous. DVSA words these rules for a brake actuator.

Rigid brake pipes

Failed on 27 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Five faults. The strongest is the suspension arm (rear): 8.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm (rear)

Failed on 31 first tests8.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 85 first tests, 3.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Failed on 22 first tests6.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension sub-frame insecurely attached to the chassis or axle is Major, and Dangerous when it is insecure and impairing directional stability. A sub-frame that is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail is also Dangerous. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens it is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 151 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 51 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Failed on 149 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Wheel bearings (rear)

Failed on 29 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive play in a wheel bearing, or a bearing that is excessively rough, is Major. Play so excessive that the bearing is likely to break up or directional control is impaired is Dangerous, and so is a bearing so rough that it is likely to overheat or break up.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt mounting area (front), 5.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Seat belt mounting area (front)

Failed on 29 first tests5.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A seat belt anchorage likely to become detached in the event of a collision is graded Dangerous. The load bearing structure near an anchorage, called a prescribed area, is Major when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Anchorage points are inspected for all seat belts fitted, except a belt with no corresponding seat.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: vehicle structure condition (rear), 4.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Vehicle structure condition (rear)

Failed on 20 first tests4.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Structure that is fractured, deformed, corroded, modified or inadequately repaired is failed on rigidity only if the overall structural rigidity of the vehicle is significantly reduced. Structure that is likely to affect steering or braking adversely is graded Dangerous. Prescribed areas are not covered here, as they are checked under other sections, including brakes and steering.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 28 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel emissions test (pre-reg turbo rules before 01/07/2008), 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (pre-reg turbo rules before 01/07/2008)

Failed on 47 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 37 first tests7.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake discs

Noted on 22 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

Individual direction indicators (front)

Noted on 23 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Noted on 65 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Wheel condition (rear)

Noted on 20 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
58in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
6in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
36in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 58.1% of 2,300 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 64.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 6 fixed and the 36 not fixed make the 42 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel1,523116,971 miles5659
Petrol77783,931 miles6257

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100200120022003200420052006200720082009Older carsNewer cars
4060801002006Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 56 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200157 in every 100423
200259 in every 100961
200357 in every 1001,524
200454 in every 1001,847
200557 in every 1001,902
2006 This car58 in every 1002,300
200757 in every 1002,464
200860 in every 1003,304
200960 in every 1003,201

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2006 X-Type.

Of 2006 X-Type vehicles with under 73,000 miles, 71 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 142,000 miles or more, 46 in every 100 did.

Under 73,000454 tests
71
73,000–95,000461 tests
66
95,000–116,000 Typical car470 tests
56
116,000–142,000449 tests
51
142,000 and over464 tests
46

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel116,971 miles5659
Petrol83,931 miles6257

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 116,971 against 83,931). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 73,00095,000–116,000142,000 and over
Suspension mounting area (rear)2.25.512.1
Tyre condition (front)1.54.75.8
Petrol engine warning light5.33.02.6
Coil spring (front)2.23.23.9
Headlight aim1.52.65.6

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

22in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

56in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

12in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2006 Jaguar X-Type follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Suspension mounting area (rear), about 15 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 58.1% of 2,300 first MOTs on the 2006 Jaguar X-Type passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 64.2%. Among 964 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Hydraulic brake callipers (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (2.9% of those tests; 28 observed failures; about 13× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2006 Jaguar X-Type at the first attempt were Suspension mounting area (rear) (15.5%), Tyre condition (front) (9.1%) and Petrol engine warning light (8.3%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Hydraulic brake callipers (rear) (2.9% of those tests; 28 observed failures; about 13× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Hydraulic brake callipers (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (2.9% of those tests; 28 observed failures; about 13× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2006 Jaguar X-Type include Hydraulic brake callipers (rear), Suspension arm (rear), Suspension sub-frame (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2006 Jaguar X-Type (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check