Hyundai Santa Fe 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 75 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2015 Hyundai Santa Fe were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (rear).

Summary

A 2015 Hyundai Santa Fe passed first time about 3 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2014 and 2016 model years.

At a glance

How 2,800 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
75 in every 100
Did not pass first time
25 in every 100695 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
10 yearsabout 80,715 miles
First tests counted
2,800

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (rear)13 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Brake pads (rear)8 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Side repeater indicators7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2015 Hyundai Santa Fe vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear): 58 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 694 of 695 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear)

Failed on 43 first tests58 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 31 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: side repeater indicators, 5.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 51 first tests5.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre condition (rear), 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre condition (rear)

Failed on 87 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Exposed or damaged ply or cords are graded Dangerous. A cut in excess of the requirements and deep enough to reach the ply or cords is Major, and testers may open the cut with a blunt instrument to check its depth. A tyre contacting the vehicle through flexing or suspension movement is not a defect; fouling fails only at the time of test.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 23 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Number plates (front)

Noted on 23 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
75in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
21in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 75.2% of 2,800 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 78.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 21 not fixed make the 25 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020152020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 76 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200455 in every 100367
200550 in every 100501
200650 in every 100831
200754 in every 100839
200857 in every 100543
200961 in every 100502
201051 in every 1002,661
201153 in every 1002,908
201252 in every 1002,682
201360 in every 1001,240
201466 in every 1002,324
2015 This car75 in every 1002,800
201678 in every 1004,095
201781 in every 1002,507
201882 in every 1001,850
201983 in every 1001,046
202084 in every 100501
202189 in every 100846
202290 in every 1001,766

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2015 Santa Fe.

Of 2015 Santa Fe vehicles with under 60,000 miles, 83 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 104,000 miles or more, 67 in every 100 did.

Under 60,000571 tests
83
60,000–74,000534 tests
79
74,000–88,000 Typical car589 tests
74
88,000–104,000540 tests
73
104,000 and over565 tests
67

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 60,00074,000–88,000104,000 and over
Tyre condition (rear)1.23.93.4
Brake pads (rear)1.43.11.1
Side repeater indicators1.62.22.7
Suspension arm ball joint (front)0.51.04.1

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

43in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

29in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2015 Hyundai Santa Fe passed first time about 3 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2014 and 2016 model years. In 2025, 75.2% of 2,800 first MOTs on the 2015 Hyundai Santa Fe passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 78.6%. Among 695 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (6.2% of those tests; 43 observed failures; about 58× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2015 Hyundai Santa Fe at the first attempt were Tyre condition (rear) (12.5%), Brake pads (rear) (7.6%) and Side repeater indicators (7.3%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear) (6.2% of those tests; 43 observed failures; about 58× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (6.2% of those tests; 43 observed failures; about 58× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Hyundai Santa Fe include Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear), Side repeater indicators, Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Hyundai Santa Fe (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check