Hyundai Getz 2005: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 50 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2005 Hyundai Getz were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Drive shaft joints and boots (front).

Summary

The 2005 Hyundai Getz follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,377 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
50 in every 100
Did not pass first time
50 in every 1001,178 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
20 yearsabout 74,774 miles
First tests counted
2,377

What failed most often

  1. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)21 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)13 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Petrol emissions (with catalyst)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2005 Hyundai Getz vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Four faults. The strongest is the suspension sub-frame (front): 30 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,170 of 1,178 failed first attempts (99.3%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Failed on 104 first tests30 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A suspension sub-frame insecurely attached to the chassis or axle is Major, and Dangerous when it is insecure and impairing directional stability. A sub-frame that is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail is also Dangerous. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens it is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 115 first tests, 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Failed on 77 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 67 first tests, 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 49 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover is Major, and so is one that no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A cover that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. DVSA uses one wording for the dust cover on any suspension joint.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Failed on 58 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

Two faults. The strongest is the drive shaft joints and boots (front): 3.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 243 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Exhaust system (front)

Failed on 75 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 108 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the petrol emissions not tested: 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions not tested

Failed on 67 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On a petrol car, an emissions test recorded as not tested or unable to be completed is failed as Major. DVSA's wording gives no reason why.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 129 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Brake light

Noted on 30 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm (front)

Noted on 72 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
50in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
9in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
41in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 50.4% of 2,377 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 59.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 41 not fixed make the 50 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100200320042005200620072008Older carsNewer cars
406080100200320042005200620072008Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 49 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200349 in every 1001,001
200450 in every 1001,973
2005 This car50 in every 1002,377
200654 in every 1002,983
200754 in every 1003,721
200855 in every 1003,375

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2005 Getz.

Of 2005 Getz vehicles with under 51,000 miles, 68 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 101,000 miles or more, 40 in every 100 did.

Under 51,000474 tests
68
51,000–67,000451 tests
55
67,000–83,000 Typical car508 tests
45
83,000–101,000458 tests
45
101,000 and over475 tests
40

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 51,00067,000–83,000101,000 and over
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)3.812.010.3
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.36.99.9
Petrol emissions (with catalyst)2.34.97.6
Windscreen washers4.63.75.7
Suspension sub-frame (front)1.35.76.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

22in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

57in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

11in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2005 Hyundai Getz follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Drive shaft joints and boots (front), about 21 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 50.4% of 2,377 first MOTs on the 2005 Hyundai Getz passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 59.2%. Among 1,178 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension sub-frame (front) appears more often than on similar cars (8.9% of those tests; 104 observed failures; about 30× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2005 Hyundai Getz at the first attempt were Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (20.8%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (13.1%) and Petrol emissions (with catalyst) (11.0%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension sub-frame (front) (8.9% of those tests; 104 observed failures; about 30× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension sub-frame (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (8.9% of those tests; 104 observed failures; about 30× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2005 Hyundai Getz include Suspension sub-frame (front), Shock absorbers (rear), Drive shaft joints and boots (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2005 Hyundai Getz (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check