At a glance
How 13,028 first tests went in 2025.
- Passed first time
- 53 in every 100
- Did not pass first time
- 47 in every 1006,132 failed first-attempt tests
- The typical car
- 20 yearsabout 93,296 miles
- First tests counted
- 13,028
What failed most often
- Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)19 in every 100 failed tests
- Individual sidelight or tail light (front)19 in every 100 failed tests
- Petrol emissions (with catalyst)10 in every 100 failed tests
How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.
These are patterns across 2005 Honda Jazz vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.
Suspension
Four faults. The strongest is the macpherson strut (front): 5.7 times as often as on similar cars.
Figures below are measured across the 6,127 of 6,132 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.
We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.
Macpherson strut (front)
What it means
Many MacPherson strut top bushes are designed to have significant lateral play when the suspension hangs free, so a top bush is rejected only when the play comes from wear or maladjustment. A top bush or bearing with excessive wear or free play is Major. Rubber or synthetic bushes are rejected only for serious deterioration of the bonding or flexible material.
Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)
What it means
Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 1,241 first tests, 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)
What it means
Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 268 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.
Wheel bearings (rear)
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.
Brakes
One fault and two wear patterns. The strongest is the brake discs (rear): 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.
Brake discs (rear)
What it means
A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 850 first tests, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)
What it means
A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.
Brake pads (rear)
What it means
A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.
Also noted as an advisory
Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 428 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.
Advisories
Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.
An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.
Macpherson strut ball joint (front)
Macpherson strut pins and bushes (front)
Macpherson strut bracket and mounting (front)
Handbrake efficiency on trikes, quads and pre-1968 vehicles (roller test)
Other suspension component (rear)
Brake pedal
Handbrake efficiency on trikes, quads and pre-1968 vehicles (decelerometer test)
Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.
MOT pass rates
How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.
- Passed first time
- 53in every 100
- Passed on the first test.
- Fixed at the station
- 10in every 100
- Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
- Failed
- 37in every 100
- Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.
First-attempt pass 52.9% of 13,028 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 62.7%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 10 fixed and the 37 not fixed make the 47 in every 100 that did not pass first time.
Same model, other years
Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.
Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.
| Year | Passed first time | First tests |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 54 in every 100 | 2,017 |
| 2003 | 54 in every 100 | 4,846 |
| 2004 | 53 in every 100 | 8,877 |
| 2005 This car | 53 in every 100 | 13,028 |
| 2006 | 54 in every 100 | 16,652 |
| 2007 | 55 in every 100 | 17,686 |
| 2008 | 55 in every 100 | 18,460 |
| 2009 | 64 in every 100 | 22,436 |
| 2010 | 67 in every 100 | 20,956 |
| 2011 | 73 in every 100 | 19,446 |
| 2012 | 75 in every 100 | 21,045 |
| 2013 | 78 in every 100 | 20,706 |
| 2014 | 81 in every 100 | 19,643 |
| 2015 | 84 in every 100 | 17,388 |
| 2016 | 86 in every 100 | 18,007 |
| 2017 | 88 in every 100 | 17,579 |
| 2018 | 89 in every 100 | 19,669 |
| 2019 | 90 in every 100 | 16,298 |
| 2020 | 91 in every 100 | 10,396 |
| 2021 | 93 in every 100 | 14,213 |
| 2022 | 94 in every 100 | 10,311 |
If you are buying one
What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.
Mileage matters most on a 2005 Jazz.
Of 2005 Jazz vehicles with under 64,000 miles, 67 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 125,000 miles or more, 45 in every 100 did.
What to check at your mileage
How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.
| Under 64,000 | 84,000–103,000 | 125,000 and over | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) | 5.7 | 9.6 | 10.9 |
| Individual sidelight or tail light (front) | 2.4 | 11.3 | 12.2 |
| Petrol emissions (with catalyst) | 2.2 | 4.6 | 7.5 |
| Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) | 2.1 | 4.9 | 5.4 |
| Suspension mounting area (rear) | 2.4 | 4.0 | 5.5 |
Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.
When a car fails
of failed cars had one item to fix.
of failed cars had three or more items to fix.
of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).
Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.
FAQs
Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.
About this data
How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.
These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.
What we include
UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.
Same-day repairs
PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.
How we compare
We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.
What this does not cover
- MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
- Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
- Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
- If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check any vehicle’s MOT history
Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.
Run a free check