Model Reports 4 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Honda HR-V 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 82 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2015 Honda HR-V were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

The 2015 Honda HR-V follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,684 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
82 in every 100
Did not pass first time
18 in every 100488 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
10 yearsabout 69,213 miles
First tests counted
2,684

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2015 Honda HR-V vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt condition (rear), 5.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 488 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Seat belt condition (rear)

Failed on 20 first tests5.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Any sign of overstretching is a deficiency, and so is a cut anywhere on a child seat belt. On other belts the size of a cut decides it, with a stricter limit at the webbing edge than away from it. Webbing significantly stretched or weakened has rows in both Major and Dangerous grades.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Visibility

One fault: windscreen wipers, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Windscreen wipers

Failed on 35 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Only a clearly damaged or worn windscreen wiper needs to be rejected. A wiper that is missing or not working is graded Major, and so is a blade that is missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen. A defective blade is graded Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
82in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
14in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 81.8% of 2,684 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 85.8%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 14 not fixed make the 18 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel1,52278,330 miles8082
Petrol1,16056,759 miles8482

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020152016201720182019202020212022Newer cars
40608010020152020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 84 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
2015 This car82 in every 1002,684
201682 in every 1006,628
201786 in every 1005,661
201889 in every 1005,884
201991 in every 1004,704
202091 in every 1003,596
202194 in every 100434
202295 in every 1005,895

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2015 HR-V.

Of 2015 HR-V vehicles with under 48,000 miles, 88 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 94,000 miles or more, 74 in every 100 did.

Under 48,000554 tests
88
48,000–62,000526 tests
84
62,000–76,000 Typical car542 tests
82
76,000–94,000524 tests
81
94,000 and over537 tests
74

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested		Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel78,330 miles8082
Petrol56,759 miles8482

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 78,330 against 56,759). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 48,00062,000–76,00094,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)1.42.42.8

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.

When a car fails

52in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

18in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2015 Honda HR-V follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre condition (front), about 11 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 81.8% of 2,684 first MOTs on the 2015 Honda HR-V passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 85.8%. Among 488 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Seat belt condition (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (4.1% of those tests; 20 observed failures; about 5.8× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2015 Honda HR-V at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (11.1%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Seat belt condition (rear) (4.1% of those tests; 20 observed failures; about 5.8× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Seat belt condition (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (4.1% of those tests; 20 observed failures; about 5.8× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Honda HR-V include Seat belt condition (rear), Windscreen wipers. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Honda HR-V (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check