Ford Transit 2011: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 50 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2011 Ford Transit were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2011 Ford Transit follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 15,280 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
50 in every 100
Did not pass first time
50 in every 1007,635 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
14 yearsabout 141,780 miles
First tests counted
15,280

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)16 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Suspension mounting area (rear)15 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Leaf spring (rear)13 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2011 Ford Transit vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Four faults. The strongest is the leaf spring (rear): 139 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 7,580 of 7,635 failed first attempts (99.3%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Leaf spring (rear)

Failed on 975 first tests139 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Modified spring anchor or shackle brackets with more mounting holes than the chassis are not a reason to reject leaf spring suspension, and neither is a missing bump stop rubber. A fractured main leaf is graded Dangerous. A spring that is fractured or seriously weakened is graded Major.

Suspension spring mounting area (rear)

Failed on 170 first tests27 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Testers check the strength and continuity of the load bearing structure within a set distance of a spring, sub-frame or suspension mounting, an area DVSA calls a prescribed area. Strength that is significantly reduced, or an area inadequately repaired, is Major. Structure so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 56 first tests, 4.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (front)

Failed on 260 first tests15 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 144 first tests, 9.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (rear)

Failed on 1,133 first tests12 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 417 first tests, 5.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

Four faults. The strongest is the chassis condition (front): 23 times as often as on similar cars.

Chassis condition (front)

Failed on 296 first tests23 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A main load-bearing structural member that is fractured, deformed, modified or inadequately repaired is Major when structural rigidity is significantly reduced, and Dangerous where steering or braking is likely to be adversely affected. Corrosion of the body, cab or chassis at a mounting point is Dangerous where overall security or stability is impaired.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 182 first tests, 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Vehicle structure condition (front)

Failed on 314 first tests22 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Structure that is fractured, deformed, corroded, modified or inadequately repaired is failed on rigidity only if the overall structural rigidity of the vehicle is significantly reduced. Structure that is likely to affect steering or braking adversely is graded Dangerous. Prescribed areas are not covered here, as they are checked under other sections, including brakes and steering.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 227 first tests, 16 times as often as on similar cars.

Vehicle structure condition (rear)

Failed on 309 first tests18 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Structure that is fractured, deformed, corroded, modified or inadequately repaired is failed on rigidity only if the overall structural rigidity of the vehicle is significantly reduced. Structure that is likely to affect steering or braking adversely is graded Dangerous. Prescribed areas are not covered here, as they are checked under other sections, including brakes and steering.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 278 first tests, 9.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Chassis condition (rear)

Failed on 405 first tests15 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A main load-bearing structural member that is fractured, deformed, modified or inadequately repaired is Major when structural rigidity is significantly reduced, and Dangerous where steering or braking is likely to be adversely affected. Corrosion of the body, cab or chassis at a mounting point is Dangerous where overall security or stability is impaired.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 385 first tests, 9.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt mounting area (front), 19 times as often as on similar cars.

Seat belt mounting area (front)

Failed on 259 first tests19 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A seat belt anchorage likely to become detached in the event of a collision is graded Dangerous. The load bearing structure near an anchorage, called a prescribed area, is Major when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Anchorage points are inspected for all seat belts fitted, except a belt with no corresponding seat.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 56 first tests, 21 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the rigid brake pipes (front): 11 times as often as on similar cars.

Rigid brake pipes (front)

Failed on 651 first tests11 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe justifies rejection once its wall thickness is reduced by a set amount, although DVSA accepts this is not easy to determine. If a tester is not sure, the benefit of the doubt applies. A leaking pipe or connection is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic system and Major on an air system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 1,427 first tests, 8.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pads

Failed on 38 first tests5.7 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Leaf spring anchor pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 50 first tests83 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Power steering pipes and hoses (front)

Noted on 220 first tests17 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Noted on 113 first tests17 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 339 first tests10 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
50in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
42in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 50.0% of 15,280 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 58.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 42 not fixed make the 50 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100199520002005201120152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100200020112020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 49 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199460 in every 100364
199559 in every 100548
199659 in every 100643
199764 in every 100694
199861 in every 100774
199964 in every 100783
200063 in every 100886
200159 in every 1001,014
200257 in every 1001,490
200355 in every 1001,729
200453 in every 1001,599
200554 in every 1002,209
200657 in every 1004,061
200755 in every 1006,955
200852 in every 1008,917
200951 in every 1008,514
201050 in every 10012,354
2011 This car50 in every 10015,280
201250 in every 10012,952
201355 in every 10017,619
201464 in every 10026,599
201565 in every 10033,241
201667 in every 10039,075
201767 in every 10041,381
201871 in every 10017,846
201975 in every 1002,613
202077 in every 1001,424
202180 in every 1001,776
202283 in every 1001,748

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2011 Transit.

Of 2011 Transit vehicles with under 104,000 miles, 55 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 185,000 miles or more, 50 in every 100 did.

Under 104,0003,074 tests
55
104,000–130,0003,028 tests
49
130,000–154,000 Typical car2,954 tests
49
154,000–185,0003,087 tests
48
185,000 and over3,040 tests
50

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 104,000130,000–154,000185,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)5.58.68.6
Suspension mounting area (rear)4.98.17.7
Leaf spring (rear)6.17.06.0
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)4.55.85.3
Number plate lights3.55.86.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

14in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

70in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

14in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2011 Ford Transit follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 16 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 50.0% of 15,280 first MOTs on the 2011 Ford Transit passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 58.4%. Among 7,635 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Leaf spring (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (12.9% of those tests; 975 observed failures; about 139× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2011 Ford Transit at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (16.0%), Suspension mounting area (rear) (14.9%) and Leaf spring (rear) (12.9%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Leaf spring (rear) (12.9% of those tests; 975 observed failures; about 139× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Leaf spring (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (12.9% of those tests; 975 observed failures; about 139× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2011 Ford Transit include Leaf spring (rear), Suspension spring mounting area (rear), Chassis condition (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2011 Ford Transit (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check