Ford Ranger 2016: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 72 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2016 Ford Ranger were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (front).

Summary

A 2016 Ford Ranger passed first time about 3 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2015 and 2017 model years.

At a glance

How 9,695 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
72 in every 100
Did not pass first time
28 in every 1002,731 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
9 yearsabout 87,145 miles
First tests counted
9,695

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (front)23 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre pressure monitoring system12 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Anti-lock braking system (ABS)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2016 Ford Ranger vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the leaf spring (rear): 95 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,729 of 2,731 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Leaf spring (rear)

Failed on 164 first tests95 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Modified spring anchor or shackle brackets with more mounting holes than the chassis are not a reason to reject leaf spring suspension, and neither is a missing bump stop rubber. A fractured main leaf is graded Dangerous. A spring that is fractured or seriously weakened is graded Major.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 635 first tests5.0 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 52 first tests, 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Three faults. The strongest is the anti-lock braking system (ABS): 7.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 222 first tests7.7 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear)

Failed on 57 first tests5.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel giving less than a set share of the maximum effort from the other wheel on the same axle is Major. On a steered axle, less than half is graded Dangerous. Testers disregard an imbalance if the lower effort is the result of a locked wheel, or if the higher effort from a wheel is at or below a low set figure.

Electronic stability control

Failed on 120 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

An ESC warning lamp is failed only when the tester is certain it indicates an ESC malfunction, because the lamp takes various forms and the owner's handbook may need checking. The system is also called ESP, VDC or DSC, among many other names. Every failure row is Major, covering the lamp, wheel speed sensors, wiring, other components and the switch.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the rear fog light: 3.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Rear fog light

Failed on 91 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 96 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre pressure monitoring system, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre pressure monitoring system

Failed on 341 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously inoperative is graded Major, and so is one listed as malfunctioning or obviously inoperative. The Minor row uses the word malfunctioning too, but its detail is a warning lamp indicating a fault, and it also covers a tyre that is obviously under-inflated.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: exhaust system, 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system

Failed on 63 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/01/2014), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/01/2014)

Failed on 68 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Leaf spring shackle pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 22 first tests44 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Chassis condition

Noted on 49 first tests17 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake fluid

Noted on 31 first tests6.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks (front)

Noted on 54 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake light

Noted on 34 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Flexible brake hoses (rear)

Noted on 23 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
72in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
23in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 71.8% of 9,695 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 76.7%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 23 not fixed make the 28 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005201020162020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000201020162020Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200062 in every 100378
200160 in every 100433
200256 in every 100571
200355 in every 100797
200452 in every 1001,330
200556 in every 1001,555
200653 in every 1001,862
200755 in every 1002,238
200856 in every 1001,686
200955 in every 1001,901
201055 in every 1001,205
201158 in every 1001,328
201259 in every 1001,683
201365 in every 1002,633
201462 in every 1003,685
201564 in every 1005,675
2016 This car72 in every 1009,695
201773 in every 1009,941
201873 in every 10013,090
201975 in every 10013,484
202077 in every 10010,846
202180 in every 10015,077
202282 in every 10014,365

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2016 Ford Ranger.

Of 2016 Ford Ranger vehicles with under 62,000 miles, 79 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 118,000 miles or more, 67 in every 100 did.

Under 62,0001,971 tests
79
62,000–79,0001,874 tests
73
79,000–96,000 Typical car1,972 tests
71
96,000–118,0001,915 tests
68
118,000 and over1,959 tests
67

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 62,00079,000–96,000118,000 and over
Coil spring (front)5.66.67.1
Tyre pressure monitoring system1.53.05.7
Anti-lock braking system (ABS)1.22.33.4
Brake pads (front)1.42.42.5
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)0.61.94.1

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

40in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

34in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

5in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2016 Ford Ranger passed first time about 3 in every 100 more often than the average of the 2015 and 2017 model years. In 2025, 71.8% of 9,695 first MOTs on the 2016 Ford Ranger passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 76.7%. Among 2,731 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Leaf spring (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (6.0% of those tests; 164 observed failures; about 95× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2016 Ford Ranger at the first attempt were Coil spring (front) (23.3%), Tyre pressure monitoring system (12.5%) and Anti-lock braking system (ABS) (8.1%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Leaf spring (rear) (6.0% of those tests; 164 observed failures; about 95× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Leaf spring (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (6.0% of those tests; 164 observed failures; about 95× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2016 Ford Ranger include Leaf spring (rear), Anti-lock braking system (ABS), Coil spring (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2016 Ford Ranger (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check