Ford Mondeo 2008: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 55 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2008 Ford Mondeo were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension arm (rear).

Summary

The 2008 Ford Mondeo follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 10,601 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
55 in every 100
Did not pass first time
45 in every 1004,811 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
17 yearsabout 135,762 miles
First tests counted
10,601

What failed most often

  1. Suspension arm (rear)15 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2008 Ford Mondeo vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Four faults. The strongest is the suspension arm (rear): 23 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 4,783 of 4,811 failed first attempts (99.4%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm (rear)

Failed on 711 first tests23 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 788 first tests, 6.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 413 first tests7.9 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 567 first tests, 4.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 194 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover is Major, and so is one that no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A cover that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. DVSA uses one wording for the dust cover on any suspension joint.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 452 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008)

Failed on 150 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: exhaust system (rear), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system (rear)

Failed on 187 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Brake fluid

Noted on 29 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 103 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm (front)

Noted on 213 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake cable (rear)

Noted on 27 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Structural sub-frame condition (rear)

Noted on 55 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Noted on 354 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
55in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
37in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 54.6% of 10,601 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 62.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 37 not fixed make the 45 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel7,750144,998 miles5455
Petrol2,848111,779 miles5754

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005200820152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100200020082020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199959 in every 100306
200057 in every 100510
200157 in every 1001,078
200255 in every 1001,230
200355 in every 1001,585
200455 in every 1002,718
200555 in every 1004,306
200656 in every 1005,209
200754 in every 1008,021
2008 This car55 in every 10010,601
200957 in every 10011,969
201058 in every 10012,696
201162 in every 10011,464
201264 in every 10014,056
201365 in every 10011,442
201467 in every 10010,556
201576 in every 10016,373
201680 in every 10015,241
201782 in every 10010,343
201883 in every 1006,594
201984 in every 1004,107
202085 in every 1002,109
202184 in every 1001,063
202286 in every 100456

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2008 Mondeo.

Of 2008 Mondeo vehicles with under 101,000 miles, 63 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 174,000 miles or more, 50 in every 100 did.

Under 101,0002,130 tests
63
101,000–124,0002,066 tests
56
124,000–147,000 Typical car2,153 tests
53
147,000–174,0002,098 tests
51
174,000 and over2,103 tests
50

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel144,998 miles5455
Petrol111,779 miles5754

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 144,998 against 111,779). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 101,000124,000–147,000174,000 and over
Suspension arm (rear)4.67.17.9
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.15.26.8
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)2.55.54.7
Tyre condition (rear)3.54.15.0
Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)2.83.84.6

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

22in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

53in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

14in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2008 Ford Mondeo follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Suspension arm (rear), about 15 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 54.6% of 10,601 first MOTs on the 2008 Ford Mondeo passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 62.6%. Among 4,811 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (14.9% of those tests; 711 observed failures; about 23× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2008 Ford Mondeo at the first attempt were Suspension arm (rear) (14.9%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (10.4%) and Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front) (9.5%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm (rear) (14.9% of those tests; 711 observed failures; about 23× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (14.9% of those tests; 711 observed failures; about 23× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2008 Ford Mondeo include Suspension arm (rear), Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear), Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2008 Ford Mondeo (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check