Ford Kuga 2018: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 84 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2018 Ford Kuga were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Brake pads (rear).

Summary

The 2018 Ford Kuga follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 36,882 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
84 in every 100
Did not pass first time
16 in every 1005,877 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
7 yearsabout 52,362 miles
First tests counted
36,882

What failed most often

  1. Brake pads (rear)12 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre tread depth (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre condition (front)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2018 Ford Kuga vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: side repeater indicators, 3.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 5,874 of 5,877 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 234 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

Two wear patterns. The strongest is the brake discs (rear): 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake discs (rear)

Failed on 173 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before it is rejected, and being worn below the manufacturer's recommended limits is not a reason in itself. Significantly and obviously worn is Major, as is contamination with oil or grease. A disc or drum that is fractured, insecure, seriously weakened or missing is graded Dangerous.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 699 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 792 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Noted on 53 first tests7.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 146 first tests6.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Number plates (rear)

Noted on 179 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Shock absorbers (rear)

Noted on 159 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
84in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
12in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 84.1% of 36,882 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 87.7%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 12 not fixed make the 16 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel25,54655,866 miles8485
Petrol11,33644,996 miles8483

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201020152018Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102018Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 85 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200860 in every 1002,035
200959 in every 1006,126
201058 in every 1008,215
201159 in every 1008,142
201262 in every 1008,637
201370 in every 10011,828
201471 in every 10021,357
201574 in every 10029,321
201678 in every 10032,042
201783 in every 10035,441
2018 This car84 in every 10036,882
201984 in every 10039,091
202087 in every 10014,872
202189 in every 10019,494
202292 in every 10024,825

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2018 Kuga.

Of 2018 Kuga vehicles with under 37,000 miles, 88 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 70,000 miles or more, 79 in every 100 did.

Under 37,0007,348 tests
88
37,000–48,0007,784 tests
86
48,000–57,000 Typical car6,732 tests
84
57,000–70,0007,513 tests
82
70,000 and over7,498 tests
79

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 37,00048,000–57,00070,000 and over
Brake pads (rear)1.31.72.5
Tyre tread depth (front)1.01.72.5
Tyre condition (front)0.81.31.9
Windscreen washers1.01.31.2
Windscreen wipers (front)1.01.00.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

56in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

16in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2018 Ford Kuga follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Brake pads (rear), about 12 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 84.1% of 36,882 first MOTs on the 2018 Ford Kuga passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 87.7%. Among 5,877 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Side repeater indicators appears more often than on similar cars (4.0% of those tests; 234 observed failures; about 3.7× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2018 Ford Kuga at the first attempt were Brake pads (rear) (11.9%), Tyre tread depth (front) (11.4%) and Tyre condition (front) (8.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Side repeater indicators (4.0% of those tests; 234 observed failures; about 3.7× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Side repeater indicators shows up more often than on similar cars (4.0% of those tests; 234 observed failures; about 3.7× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2018 Ford Kuga include Side repeater indicators. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2018 Ford Kuga (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check