Ford Kuga 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 74 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2015 Ford Kuga were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre pressure monitoring system.

Summary

The 2015 Ford Kuga follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 29,321 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
74 in every 100
Did not pass first time
26 in every 1007,566 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
10 yearsabout 79,368 miles
First tests counted
29,321

What failed most often

  1. Tyre pressure monitoring system22 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)22 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake pads (rear)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2015 Ford Kuga vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: individual sidelight or tail light (front), 4.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 7,546 of 7,566 failed first attempts (99.7%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 1,629 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: exhaust system (rear), 4.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system (rear)

Failed on 242 first tests4.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm pins and bushes (rear), 4.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 153 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 599 first tests, 7.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre pressure monitoring system (front), 4.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre pressure monitoring system (front)

Failed on 1,677 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously inoperative is graded Major, and so is one listed as malfunctioning or obviously inoperative. The Minor row uses the word malfunctioning too, but its detail is a warning lamp indicating a fault, and it also covers a tyre that is obviously under-inflated.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the anti-lock braking system (ABS): 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 268 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 708 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Structural sub-frame condition (rear)

Noted on 28 first tests7.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 66 first tests6.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar linkage pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 29 first tests5.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Noted on 458 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake fluid

Noted on 36 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Noted on 129 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Other suspension component pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 21 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
74in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
21in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 74.2% of 29,321 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 79.5%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 21 not fixed make the 26 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel26,16281,200 miles7474
Petrol3,15963,423 miles7773

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020152020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 77 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200860 in every 1002,035
200959 in every 1006,126
201058 in every 1008,215
201159 in every 1008,142
201262 in every 1008,637
201370 in every 10011,828
201471 in every 10021,357
2015 This car74 in every 10029,321
201678 in every 10032,042
201783 in every 10035,441
201884 in every 10036,882
201984 in every 10039,091
202087 in every 10014,872
202189 in every 10019,494
202292 in every 10024,825

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2015 Kuga.

Of 2015 Kuga vehicles with under 59,000 miles, 85 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 102,000 miles or more, 66 in every 100 did.

Under 59,0005,797 tests
85
59,000–73,0005,833 tests
78
73,000–86,000 Typical car5,967 tests
72
86,000–102,0005,832 tests
70
102,000 and over5,858 tests
66

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel81,200 miles7474
Petrol63,423 miles7773

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 81,200 against 63,423). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 59,00073,000–86,000102,000 and over
Tyre pressure monitoring system2.06.67.9
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.06.48.0
Brake pads (rear)1.62.62.7
Tyre tread depth (front)0.72.12.5
Tyre condition (rear)1.11.81.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

45in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

27in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2015 Ford Kuga follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Tyre pressure monitoring system, about 22 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 74.2% of 29,321 first MOTs on the 2015 Ford Kuga passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 79.5%. Among 7,566 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) appears more often than on similar cars (21.6% of those tests; 1,629 observed failures; about 4.8× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2015 Ford Kuga at the first attempt were Tyre pressure monitoring system (22.2%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (21.6%) and Brake pads (rear) (9.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (21.6% of those tests; 1,629 observed failures; about 4.8× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Individual sidelight or tail light (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (21.6% of those tests; 1,629 observed failures; about 4.8× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Ford Kuga include Individual sidelight or tail light (front), Exhaust system (rear), Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Ford Kuga (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check