Ford Ka 2018: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 80 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2018 Ford Ka were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Track rod end (front).

Summary

A 2018 Ford Ka passed first time about 4 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2017 and 2019 model years.

At a glance

How 10,615 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
80 in every 100
Did not pass first time
20 in every 1002,137 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
7 yearsabout 34,248 miles
First tests counted
10,615

What failed most often

  1. Track rod end (front)13 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Brake pads (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre condition (front)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2018 Ford Ka vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults. The strongest is the headlight levelling device (front): 24 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,136 of 2,137 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Headlight levelling device (front)

Failed on 73 first tests24 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A headlamp levelling device that is inoperative is graded Major, and so is a manual levelling device that cannot be operated from the driver's seat. Vehicles with high intensity discharge or LED dipped beam headlamps may have a self-levelling system, and if fitted it must work. Where it is not easy to tell, testers give the benefit of the doubt, and motor caravans are not checked.

Headlight (front)

Failed on 136 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

On vehicles first used on or after a set date, a halogen headlamp unit converted to take HID or LED bulbs fails for light source and lamp not compatible, which is Major. A complete unit built with those light sources is not failed for that. The precise position of the lamps is not part of the inspection beyond a visual look to see that they sit at about the same height and distance from each side.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 58 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

One fault: anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front), 4.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Failed on 68 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 46 first tests, 5.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Steering

One fault: track rod end (front), 3.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Track rod end (front)

Failed on 286 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is Major, and one worn to the extent there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. A dust cover that is damaged but still keeps dirt out is Minor, and one missing or no longer keeping dirt out is Major. Testers must tell wear from a joint's built-in clearance or spring loading.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 95 first tests, 15 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: drive shaft joints and boots (front), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 129 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol emissions (with catalyst), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 66 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Individual direction indicators (front)

Noted on 27 first tests30 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake light

Noted on 28 first tests10 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring (rear)

Noted on 71 first tests7.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring (front)

Noted on 25 first tests6.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Exhaust system

Noted on 43 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
80in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
16in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 79.9% of 10,615 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 84.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 16 not fixed make the 20 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020152018Older cars
40608010020102018Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 83 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200152 in every 100306
200249 in every 100607
200349 in every 1001,035
200449 in every 1001,369
200552 in every 1001,643
200649 in every 1001,983
200749 in every 1002,698
200849 in every 1003,392
200955 in every 10014,844
201056 in every 10016,047
201161 in every 10014,315
201264 in every 10015,488
201366 in every 10017,337
201469 in every 10017,480
201568 in every 10012,575
201672 in every 1007,955
201781 in every 10012,895
2018 This car80 in every 10010,615
201986 in every 1009,684

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2018 Ford Ka.

Of 2018 Ford Ka vehicles with under 21,000 miles, 90 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 51,000 miles or more, 68 in every 100 did.

Under 21,0002,206 tests
90
21,000–30,0002,118 tests
86
30,000–39,000 Typical car2,068 tests
79
39,000–51,0002,112 tests
76
51,000 and over2,110 tests
68

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 21,00030,000–39,00051,000 and over
Track rod end (front)1.23.33.6
Brake pads (front)0.52.92.8
Tyre condition (front)1.01.83.2
Tyre tread depth (front)0.41.62.9
Headlight aim0.81.32.2

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

53in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

19in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

5in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2018 Ford Ka passed first time about 4 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2017 and 2019 model years. In 2025, 79.9% of 10,615 first MOTs on the 2018 Ford Ka passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 84.4%. Among 2,137 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Headlight levelling device (front) appears more often than on similar cars (3.4% of those tests; 73 observed failures; about 24× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2018 Ford Ka at the first attempt were Track rod end (front) (13.4%), Brake pads (front) (10.2%) and Tyre condition (front) (8.5%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Headlight levelling device (front) (3.4% of those tests; 73 observed failures; about 24× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Headlight levelling device (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.4% of those tests; 73 observed failures; about 24× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2018 Ford Ka include Headlight levelling device (front), Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front), Track rod end (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2018 Ford Ka (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check