Ford Galaxy 2017: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 78 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2017 Ford Galaxy were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Brake pads (rear).

Summary

The 2017 Ford Galaxy follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 4,620 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
78 in every 100
Did not pass first time
22 in every 1001,029 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
8 yearsabout 79,098 miles
First tests counted
4,620

What failed most often

  1. Brake pads (rear)14 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre tread depth (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre pressure monitoring system10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2017 Ford Galaxy vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

Three faults. The strongest is the headlight levelling device: 16 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,029 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Headlight levelling device

Failed on 35 first tests16 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A headlamp levelling device that is inoperative is graded Major, and so is a manual levelling device that cannot be operated from the driver's seat. Vehicles with high intensity discharge or LED dipped beam headlamps may have a self-levelling system, and if fitted it must work. Where it is not easy to tell, testers give the benefit of the doubt, and motor caravans are not checked.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 41 first tests7.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 28 first tests, 5.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 93 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 28 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre pressure monitoring system, 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre pressure monitoring system

Failed on 104 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A tyre pressure monitoring system that is obviously inoperative is graded Major, and so is one listed as malfunctioning or obviously inoperative. The Minor row uses the word malfunctioning too, but its detail is a warning lamp indicating a fault, and it also covers a tyre that is obviously under-inflated.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the anti-lock braking system (ABS): 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 23 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 140 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Number plates (rear)

Noted on 37 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Engine oil leaks

Noted on 102 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
78in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
18in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 77.7% of 4,620 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 82.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 18 not fixed make the 22 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020172020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020172020Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 79 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200355 in every 100453
200448 in every 100538
200550 in every 100906
200650 in every 1001,175
200753 in every 1002,440
200854 in every 1002,696
200954 in every 1003,184
201055 in every 1003,613
201154 in every 1003,861
201257 in every 1003,977
201357 in every 1003,505
201456 in every 1003,931
201562 in every 1002,204
201677 in every 1004,211
2017 This car78 in every 1004,620
201879 in every 1002,974
201977 in every 1002,271
202081 in every 1001,520
202175 in every 1001,194
202282 in every 1001,134

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2017 Galaxy.

Of 2017 Galaxy vehicles with under 53,000 miles, 84 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 126,000 miles or more, 77 in every 100 did.

Under 53,000891 tests
84
53,000–71,000981 tests
81
71,000–89,000 Typical car891 tests
75
89,000–126,000922 tests
71
126,000 and over933 tests
77

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 53,00071,000–89,000126,000 and over
Brake pads (rear)2.13.62.5
Tyre tread depth (front)2.42.62.1
Tyre pressure monitoring system0.41.34.9
Tyre condition (front)1.72.81.7
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)0.41.24.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

47in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

24in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2017 Ford Galaxy follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Brake pads (rear), about 14 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 77.7% of 4,620 first MOTs on the 2017 Ford Galaxy passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 82.4%. Among 1,029 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Headlight levelling device appears more often than on similar cars (3.4% of those tests; 35 observed failures; about 16× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2017 Ford Galaxy at the first attempt were Brake pads (rear) (13.6%), Tyre tread depth (front) (11.1%) and Tyre pressure monitoring system (10.1%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Headlight levelling device (3.4% of those tests; 35 observed failures; about 16× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Headlight levelling device shows up more often than on similar cars (3.4% of those tests; 35 observed failures; about 16× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2017 Ford Galaxy include Headlight levelling device, Individual direction indicators (rear), Airbag warning light. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2017 Ford Galaxy (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check