Ford Galaxy 2007: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 53 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2007 Ford Galaxy were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2007 Ford Galaxy follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 2,440 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
53 in every 100
Did not pass first time
47 in every 1001,146 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
18 yearsabout 147,873 miles
First tests counted
2,440

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)17 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Suspension arm (rear)17 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2007 Ford Galaxy vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the suspension arm (rear): 21 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,118 of 1,146 failed first attempts (97.6%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like. 2.4% of failures are excluded because no mileage was recorded, so treat these shares as indicative for this model year.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm (rear)

Failed on 188 first tests21 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 175 first tests, 5.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 87 first tests6.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 136 first tests, 3.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 110 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the diesel emissions not tested: 3.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions not tested

Failed on 34 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

An emissions test on a diesel that is unable to be completed is graded Major. The failure wording 'not tested' carries the same Major grade.

Diesel emissions test (pre-reg turbo rules before 01/07/2008)

Failed on 57 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Steering

One fault: steering rack (front), 3.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Steering rack (front)

Failed on 29 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Steering gear casing retaining devices dangerously loose, or visible relative movement to the chassis or bodywork, is graded Dangerous. A casing not properly attached, or fractured, is Major, but a fracture that affects the stability or attachment of the casing is Dangerous. A gaiter damaged but still keeping dirt out is Minor, and Major once missing or no longer doing so.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Brakes

One wear pattern: brake pads (rear), 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake pads (rear)

Failed on 77 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

A pad worn down to its wear indicator, or contaminated with oil or grease, is Major. A pad worn below the set thickness limit, missing or incorrectly mounted is Dangerous. The manual treats an illuminated brake wear indicator as no reason for failure, although DVSA also lists an illuminated indicator as a Major row.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: exhaust system (rear), 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system (rear)

Failed on 70 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt condition (rear), 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Seat belt condition (rear)

Failed on 26 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Any sign of overstretching is a deficiency, and so is a cut anywhere on a child seat belt. On other belts the size of a cut decides it, with a stricter limit at the webbing edge than away from it. Webbing significantly stretched or weakened has rows in both Major and Dangerous grades.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 21 first tests, 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Brake light

Noted on 36 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Seat belt condition (front)

Noted on 41 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 20 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (rear)

Noted on 192 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm (front)

Noted on 41 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
53in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
39in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 53.0% of 2,440 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 60.8%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 39 not fixed make the 47 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002007201020152020Older carsNewer cars
406080100200720102020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 51 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200355 in every 100453
200448 in every 100538
200550 in every 100906
200650 in every 1001,175
2007 This car53 in every 1002,440
200854 in every 1002,696
200954 in every 1003,184
201055 in every 1003,613
201154 in every 1003,861
201257 in every 1003,977
201357 in every 1003,505
201456 in every 1003,931
201562 in every 1002,204
201677 in every 1004,211
201778 in every 1004,620
201879 in every 1002,974
201977 in every 1002,271
202081 in every 1001,520
202175 in every 1001,194
202282 in every 1001,134

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes little difference on a 2007 Galaxy.

Of 2007 Galaxy vehicles with under 116,000 miles, 57 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 181,000 miles or more, 56 in every 100 did.

Under 116,000481 tests
57
116,000–138,000482 tests
54
138,000–158,000 Typical car479 tests
53
158,000–181,000488 tests
48
181,000 and over472 tests
56

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 116,000138,000–158,000181,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)6.08.48.3
Suspension arm (rear)7.59.45.5
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)5.45.03.8
Brake light4.44.62.8
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)2.95.63.8

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

19in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

61in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

12in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2007 Ford Galaxy follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 17 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 53.0% of 2,440 first MOTs on the 2007 Ford Galaxy passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 60.8%. Among 1,146 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (16.8% of those tests; 188 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2007 Ford Galaxy at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (17.4%), Suspension arm (rear) (16.8%) and Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front) (9.8%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm (rear) (16.8% of those tests; 188 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (16.8% of those tests; 188 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2007 Ford Galaxy include Suspension arm (rear), Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear), Diesel emissions not tested. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2007 Ford Galaxy (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check