Ford EcoSport 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 64 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2015 Ford EcoSport were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Brake light.

Summary

The 2015 Ford EcoSport follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 9,812 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
64 in every 100
Did not pass first time
36 in every 1003,552 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
10 yearsabout 64,068 miles
First tests counted
9,812

What failed most often

  1. Brake light15 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Tyre pressure monitoring system10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2015 Ford EcoSport vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the swivel pins and bushes (rear): 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 3,506 of 3,552 failed first attempts (98.7%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Swivel pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 202 first tests14 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A stub axle swivel pin or bush that is excessively worn is Major. One that is insecure, or so worn or insecure that directional stability is impaired, is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 258 first tests, 9.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 189 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Whether a suspension arm ball joint dust cover still keeps dirt out decides its grade. Severely deteriorated is Minor, while missing, or no longer preventing the ingress of dirt, is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Three faults. The strongest is the brake hand lever: 5.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake hand lever

Failed on 81 first tests5.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A brake lever is failed for insufficient reserve only if it is touching the floor or handlebar. On motorcycle derived systems the lever may touch the handlebar, so the extent of reserve travel is assessed during the brake test. A lever not releasing correctly is Minor, and Major where the functionality of the brakes is affected.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 129 first tests5.2 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 347 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the individual direction indicators (rear): 5.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 113 first tests5.4 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 109 first tests, 5.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake light (rear)

Failed on 533 first tests5.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: exhaust system (rear), 4.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system (rear)

Failed on 116 first tests4.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 104 first tests, 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the petrol emissions not tested: 4.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions not tested

Failed on 99 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

On a petrol car, an emissions test recorded as not tested or unable to be completed is failed as Major. DVSA's wording gives no reason why.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 293 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Individual direction indicators (front)

Noted on 111 first tests35 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Suspension sub-frame pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 61 first tests10 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Coil spring (front)

Noted on 276 first tests10.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring (rear)

Noted on 1,006 first tests9.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks

Noted on 158 first tests8.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Other suspension component pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 25 first tests6.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
64in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
28in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 63.8% of 9,812 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 72.3%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 28 not fixed make the 36 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol7,23561,088 miles6463
Diesel2,57773,583 miles6466

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201420152016201720182019202020212022Older carsNewer cars
40608010020152020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 67 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
201461 in every 1002,366
2015 This car64 in every 1009,812
201668 in every 10013,411
201770 in every 10012,633
201880 in every 10021,629
201982 in every 10023,850
202082 in every 1008,494
202186 in every 1004,963
202287 in every 1008,993

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2015 EcoSport.

Of 2015 EcoSport vehicles with under 46,000 miles, 77 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 85,000 miles or more, 55 in every 100 did.

Under 46,0001,979 tests
77
46,000–59,0001,978 tests
66
59,000–70,000 Typical car1,848 tests
61
70,000–85,0001,977 tests
59
85,000 and over1,920 tests
55

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol61,088 miles6463
Diesel73,583 miles6466

Figures are in every 100 first tests. At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 46,00059,000–70,00085,000 and over
Brake light4.06.06.6
Tyre pressure monitoring system1.44.34.6
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)0.83.56.7
Track rod end (front)0.53.15.4
Petrol emissions (with catalyst)1.03.94.6

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

31in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

40in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2015 Ford EcoSport follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Brake light, about 15 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 63.8% of 9,812 first MOTs on the 2015 Ford EcoSport passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 72.3%. Among 3,552 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Swivel pins and bushes (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (5.8% of those tests; 202 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2015 Ford EcoSport at the first attempt were Brake light (15.2%), Tyre pressure monitoring system (10.1%) and Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (9.9%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Swivel pins and bushes (rear) (5.8% of those tests; 202 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Swivel pins and bushes (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (5.8% of those tests; 202 observed failures; about 14× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Ford EcoSport include Swivel pins and bushes (rear), Individual direction indicators (rear), Handbrake lever. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Ford EcoSport (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check