Ford EcoSport 2014: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 61 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2014 Ford EcoSport were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Brake light (rear).

Summary

A 2014 Ford EcoSport passed first time about 3 in every 100 less often than the 2015 model year next to it.

At a glance

How 2,366 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
61 in every 100
Did not pass first time
39 in every 100931 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
11 yearsabout 72,236 miles
First tests counted
2,366

What failed most often

  1. Brake light (rear)13 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Track rod end (front)13 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2014 Ford EcoSport vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the swivel pins and bushes (rear): 21 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 906 of 931 failed first attempts (97.3%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like. 2.7% of failures are excluded because no mileage was recorded, so treat these shares as indicative for this model year.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Swivel pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 78 first tests21 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A stub axle swivel pin or bush that is excessively worn is Major. One that is insecure, or so worn or insecure that directional stability is impaired, is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 73 first tests, 9.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Failed on 20 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 25 first tests, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 66 first tests4.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Whether a suspension arm ball joint dust cover still keeps dirt out decides its grade. Severely deteriorated is Minor, while missing, or no longer preventing the ingress of dirt, is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the individual direction indicators (front): 7.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (front)

Failed on 20 first tests7.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 36 first tests, 31 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake light (rear)

Failed on 119 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the handbrake lever: 5.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 36 first tests5.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 94 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: exhaust system (rear), 3.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system (rear)

Failed on 28 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 32 first tests, 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol emissions (with catalyst), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 62 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Steering

One fault: track rod end (front), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Track rod end (front)

Failed on 118 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is Major, and one worn to the extent there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. A dust cover that is damaged but still keeps dirt out is Minor, and one missing or no longer keeping dirt out is Major. Testers must tell wear from a joint's built-in clearance or spring loading.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 27 first tests, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Coil spring (front)

Noted on 89 first tests8.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring (rear)

Noted on 252 first tests6.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks

Noted on 30 first tests5.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Noted on 30 first tests4.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
61in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
31in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 60.7% of 2,366 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 69.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 31 not fixed make the 39 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol1,34768,338 miles6160
Diesel1,01977,504 miles6062

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100201420152016201720182019202020212022Newer cars
40608010020142020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 65 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
2014 This car61 in every 1002,366
201564 in every 1009,812
201668 in every 10013,411
201770 in every 10012,633
201880 in every 10021,629
201982 in every 10023,850
202082 in every 1008,494
202186 in every 1004,963
202287 in every 1008,993

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2014 EcoSport.

Of 2014 EcoSport vehicles with under 52,000 miles, 72 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 95,000 miles or more, 52 in every 100 did.

Under 52,000469 tests
72
52,000–66,000463 tests
65
66,000–78,000 Typical car447 tests
57
78,000–95,000479 tests
58
95,000 and over454 tests
52

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 52,00066,000–78,00095,000 and over
Brake light (rear)4.35.45.3
Track rod end (front)1.93.88.1
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.34.37.3
Swivel pins and bushes (rear)2.63.45.1
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover (front)1.53.82.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

34in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

38in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2014 Ford EcoSport passed first time about 3 in every 100 less often than the 2015 model year next to it. In 2025, 60.7% of 2,366 first MOTs on the 2014 Ford EcoSport passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 69.4%. Among 931 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Swivel pins and bushes (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (8.6% of those tests; 78 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2014 Ford EcoSport at the first attempt were Brake light (rear) (13.1%), Track rod end (front) (13.0%) and Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (10.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Swivel pins and bushes (rear) (8.6% of those tests; 78 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Swivel pins and bushes (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (8.6% of those tests; 78 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2014 Ford EcoSport include Swivel pins and bushes (rear), Individual direction indicators (front), Handbrake lever. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2014 Ford EcoSport (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check