Ford C-Max 2009: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 54 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2009 Ford C-Max were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2009 Ford C-Max follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 4,451 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
54 in every 100
Did not pass first time
46 in every 1002,028 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
16 yearsabout 102,016 miles
First tests counted
4,451

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre condition (front)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2009 Ford C-Max vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar linkage (rear): 14 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,979 of 2,028 failed first attempts (97.6%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like. 2.4% of failures are excluded because no mileage was recorded, so treat these shares as indicative for this model year.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Anti-roll bar linkage (rear)

Failed on 91 first tests14 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

An anti-roll bar linkage is graded Dangerous when a suspension component is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail. Insecure attachment that impairs directional stability is graded Dangerous too. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens the part is Major, and so is plain insecure attachment to the chassis or axle.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 196 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Steering

One fault: steering rack (front), 11 times as often as on similar cars.

Steering rack (front)

Failed on 112 first tests11 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Steering gear casing retaining devices dangerously loose, or visible relative movement to the chassis or bodywork, is graded Dangerous. A casing not properly attached, or fractured, is Major, but a fracture that affects the stability or attachment of the casing is Dangerous. A gaiter damaged but still keeping dirt out is Minor, and Major once missing or no longer doing so.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail.

Other power steering components

Noted on 47 first tests11 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 54 first tests6.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (front)

Noted on 49 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (rear)

Noted on 47 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm (rear)

Noted on 144 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring (front)

Noted on 167 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks

Noted on 56 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake discs (rear)

Noted on 260 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
54in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
10in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
36in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 54.4% of 4,451 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 63.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 10 fixed and the 36 not fixed make the 46 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol3,44298,616 miles5555
Diesel1,009113,276 miles5254

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020092015Older carsNewer cars
4060801002009Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 55 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200751 in every 1003,659
200852 in every 1008,076
2009 This car54 in every 1004,451
201056 in every 1005,170
201163 in every 1009,555
201263 in every 10010,220
201368 in every 10012,957
201469 in every 10011,973
201572 in every 10010,919
201678 in every 10010,179
201782 in every 1007,766
201880 in every 1004,665
201983 in every 1002,514

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2009 C-Max.

Of 2009 C-Max vehicles with under 77,000 miles, 66 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 129,000 miles or more, 48 in every 100 did.

Under 77,000871 tests
66
77,000–94,000867 tests
58
94,000–110,000 Typical car896 tests
53
110,000–129,000858 tests
49
129,000 and over872 tests
48

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol98,616 miles5555
Diesel113,276 miles5254

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 113,276 against 98,616). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 77,00094,000–110,000129,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)0.88.89.9
Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)3.14.83.8
Tyre condition (front)3.14.64.9
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)3.82.95.3
Suspension arm ball joint (front)1.43.35.2

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

27in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

47in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

13in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2009 Ford C-Max follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 14 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 54.4% of 4,451 first MOTs on the 2009 Ford C-Max passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 63.6%. Among 2,028 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Steering rack (front) appears more often than on similar cars (5.7% of those tests; 112 observed failures; about 11× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2009 Ford C-Max at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (14.0%), Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) (9.9%) and Tyre condition (front) (9.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Steering rack (front) (5.7% of those tests; 112 observed failures; about 11× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Steering rack (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (5.7% of those tests; 112 observed failures; about 11× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2009 Ford C-Max include Steering rack (front), Anti-roll bar linkage (rear), Suspension arm pins and bushes (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2009 Ford C-Max (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check