Fiat Punto 2010: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 52 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2010 Fiat Punto were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Petrol emissions (with catalyst).

Summary

A 2010 Fiat Punto passed first time about 2 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2009 and 2011 model years.

At a glance

How 6,606 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
52 in every 100
Did not pass first time
48 in every 1003,142 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
15 yearsabout 87,711 miles
First tests counted
6,606

What failed most often

  1. Petrol emissions (with catalyst)14 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)14 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Coil spring (front)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2010 Fiat Punto vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the suspension sub-frame (front): 5.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 3,105 of 3,142 failed first attempts (98.8%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Failed on 114 first tests5.9 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A suspension sub-frame insecurely attached to the chassis or axle is Major, and Dangerous when it is insecure and impairing directional stability. A sub-frame that is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail is also Dangerous. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens it is Major.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Failed on 271 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 274 first tests, 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the individual direction indicators (front): 5.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (front)

Failed on 176 first tests5.7 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 161 first tests, 5.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 154 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Body and structure

One fault: exhaust system (front), 5.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system (front)

Failed on 164 first tests5.1 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 130 first tests, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Three faults. The strongest is the petrol emissions (with catalyst): 3.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 424 first tests3.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Petrol emissions not tested

Failed on 156 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

On a petrol car, an emissions test recorded as not tested or unable to be completed is failed as Major. DVSA's wording gives no reason why.

Petrol engine warning light

Failed on 198 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) on a petrol engine is a Major failure when it is illuminated indicating a malfunction. The detail line DVSA gives for the same row also names an inoperative lamp. The test covers only certain petrol vehicles, depending on their age, size and fuel type.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 89 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

All direction indicators

Noted on 20 first tests8.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake cable (rear)

Noted on 25 first tests7.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks (front)

Noted on 145 first tests4.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm (front)

Noted on 175 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Coil spring (rear)

Noted on 612 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring (front)

Noted on 216 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
52in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
10in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
38in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 52.4% of 6,606 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 61.9%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 10 fixed and the 38 not fixed make the 48 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100200520102015Older carsNewer cars
4060801002010Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 54 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200252 in every 100539
200356 in every 100835
200450 in every 1001,483
200555 in every 1001,172
200651 in every 1004,208
200750 in every 1006,732
200852 in every 1005,519
200955 in every 1005,886
2010 This car52 in every 1006,606
201155 in every 1004,980
201256 in every 1005,358
201355 in every 1003,949
201457 in every 1003,382
201562 in every 1002,346
201665 in every 1001,634
201763 in every 1001,188
201861 in every 100304

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2010 Punto.

Of 2010 Punto vehicles with under 65,000 miles, 62 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 112,000 miles or more, 45 in every 100 did.

Under 65,0001,352 tests
62
65,000–81,0001,302 tests
55
81,000–95,000 Typical car1,302 tests
51
95,000–112,0001,289 tests
49
112,000 and over1,302 tests
45

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 65,00081,000–95,000112,000 and over
Petrol emissions (with catalyst)3.57.39.6
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)3.57.78.2
Coil spring (front)5.06.05.1
Headlight aim2.94.16.1
Shock absorbers (rear)4.43.84.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

23in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

54in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2010 Fiat Punto passed first time about 2 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2009 and 2011 model years. In 2025, 52.4% of 6,606 first MOTs on the 2010 Fiat Punto passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 61.9%. Among 3,142 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension sub-frame (front) appears more often than on similar cars (3.7% of those tests; 114 observed failures; about 5.9× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2010 Fiat Punto at the first attempt were Petrol emissions (with catalyst) (13.7%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (13.6%) and Coil spring (front) (10.7%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension sub-frame (front) (3.7% of those tests; 114 observed failures; about 5.9× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension sub-frame (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.7% of those tests; 114 observed failures; about 5.9× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2010 Fiat Punto include Suspension sub-frame (front), Individual direction indicators (front), Exhaust system (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2010 Fiat Punto (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check