Fiat Punto 2007: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 50 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2007 Fiat Punto were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Petrol emissions (with catalyst).

Summary

The 2007 Fiat Punto follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 6,732 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
50 in every 100
Did not pass first time
50 in every 1003,360 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
18 yearsabout 88,932 miles
First tests counted
6,732

What failed most often

  1. Petrol emissions (with catalyst)17 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)9 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2007 Fiat Punto vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Body and structure

Two faults. The strongest is the other passenger door condition (rear): 9.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 3,095 of 3,360 failed first attempts (92.1%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like. 7.9% of failures are excluded because no mileage was recorded, so treat these shares as indicative for this model year.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Other passenger door condition (rear)

Failed on 115 first tests9.6 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A lack of door handles is not a defect where it comes from the original design or a specialist modification, provided the door latches securely closed and opens using a control such as a button or a fob. Hinges, catches and pillars are rejected for deterioration only if the doors stop working as intended. A hinged door likely to open inadvertently or not remain closed is graded Dangerous.

Exhaust system (front)

Failed on 171 first tests5.8 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 162 first tests, 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the suspension sub-frame (front): 6.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Failed on 127 first tests6.6 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A suspension sub-frame insecurely attached to the chassis or axle is Major, and Dangerous when it is insecure and impairing directional stability. A sub-frame that is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail is also Dangerous. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens it is Major.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Failed on 202 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 248 first tests, 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the petrol emissions (with catalyst): 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 516 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Petrol emissions not tested

Failed on 165 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On a petrol car, an emissions test recorded as not tested or unable to be completed is failed as Major. DVSA's wording gives no reason why.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Four faults. The strongest is the individual direction indicators (front): 3.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (front)

Failed on 113 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 122 first tests, 4.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 204 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Failed on 260 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 53 first tests, 8.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Rear fog light

Failed on 90 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Brake cable (rear)

Noted on 23 first tests5.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Seat belt condition (rear)

Noted on 58 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Transmission oil leaks (front)

Noted on 149 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring (rear)

Noted on 703 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
50in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
9in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
41in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 50.1% of 6,732 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 59.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 9 fixed and the 41 not fixed make the 50 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

406080100200720102015Older carsNewer cars
40608010020072010Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200252 in every 100539
200356 in every 100835
200450 in every 1001,483
200555 in every 1001,172
200651 in every 1004,208
2007 This car50 in every 1006,732
200852 in every 1005,519
200955 in every 1005,886
201052 in every 1006,606
201155 in every 1004,980
201256 in every 1005,358
201355 in every 1003,949
201457 in every 1003,382
201562 in every 1002,346
201665 in every 1001,634
201763 in every 1001,188
201861 in every 100304

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2007 Punto.

Of 2007 Punto vehicles with under 64,000 miles, 62 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 114,000 miles or more, 45 in every 100 did.

Under 64,0001,276 tests
62
64,000–82,0001,265 tests
52
82,000–97,000 Typical car1,220 tests
49
97,000–114,0001,222 tests
44
114,000 and over1,273 tests
45

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 64,00082,000–97,000114,000 and over
Petrol emissions (with catalyst)4.58.710.8
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.35.67.5
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.55.67.1
Brake light (rear)3.84.05.2
Windscreen washers2.44.34.8

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

22in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

54in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2007 Fiat Punto follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Petrol emissions (with catalyst), about 17 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 50.1% of 6,732 first MOTs on the 2007 Fiat Punto passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 59.2%. Among 3,360 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Other passenger door condition (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (3.7% of those tests; 115 observed failures; about 9.6× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2007 Fiat Punto at the first attempt were Petrol emissions (with catalyst) (16.7%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (11.3%) and Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (9.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Other passenger door condition (rear) (3.7% of those tests; 115 observed failures; about 9.6× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Other passenger door condition (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (3.7% of those tests; 115 observed failures; about 9.6× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2007 Fiat Punto include Other passenger door condition (rear), Suspension sub-frame (front), Exhaust system (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2007 Fiat Punto (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check