Fiat Panda 2017: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 76 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2017 Fiat Panda were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (front).

Summary

The 2017 Fiat Panda follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 3,400 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
76 in every 100
Did not pass first time
24 in every 100831 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
8 yearsabout 36,309 miles
First tests counted
3,400

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (front)17 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Shock absorbers (rear)12 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre condition (front)7 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2017 Fiat Panda vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the shock absorbers (rear): 11 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 830 of 831 failed first attempts (99.9%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Failed on 101 first tests11 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 76 first tests, 6.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 137 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the individual sidelight or tail light (front): 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (front)

Failed on 34 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Brake light (rear)

Failed on 50 first tests2.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

One fault: petrol emissions (with catalyst), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 32 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Engine oil leaks

Noted on 59 first tests3.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Exhaust system (front)

Noted on 23 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Non-component advisories (front)

Noted on 43 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
76in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
19in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 75.6% of 3,400 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 80.5%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 19 not fixed make the 24 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020172020Older carsNewer cars
406080100201020172020Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 79 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200449 in every 1001,898
200552 in every 1002,329
200653 in every 1003,045
200753 in every 1004,080
200852 in every 1003,891
200956 in every 1008,653
201057 in every 1007,823
201158 in every 1004,871
201264 in every 1005,966
201365 in every 1007,045
201468 in every 1007,563
201570 in every 1007,591
201673 in every 1004,645
2017 This car76 in every 1003,400
201879 in every 1002,590
201981 in every 1002,470
202083 in every 1001,727
202185 in every 1001,091
202290 in every 100680

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2017 Panda.

Of 2017 Panda vehicles with under 21,000 miles, 85 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 57,000 miles or more, 65 in every 100 did.

Under 21,000700 tests
85
21,000–31,000650 tests
80
31,000–42,000 Typical car704 tests
78
42,000–57,000683 tests
70
57,000 and over662 tests
65

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 21,00031,000–42,00057,000 and over
Coil spring (front)4.32.44.4
Shock absorbers (rear)0.73.34.7
Tyre condition (front)1.02.12.9
Brake light0.31.02.4

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

51in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

21in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

5in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2017 Fiat Panda follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Coil spring (front), about 17 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 75.6% of 3,400 first MOTs on the 2017 Fiat Panda passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 80.5%. Among 831 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Shock absorbers (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (12.2% of those tests; 101 observed failures; about 11× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2017 Fiat Panda at the first attempt were Coil spring (front) (16.5%), Shock absorbers (rear) (12.2%) and Tyre condition (front) (7.2%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Shock absorbers (rear) (12.2% of those tests; 101 observed failures; about 11× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Shock absorbers (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (12.2% of those tests; 101 observed failures; about 11× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2017 Fiat Panda include Shock absorbers (rear), Coil spring (front), Individual sidelight or tail light (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2017 Fiat Panda (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check