Fiat Panda 2009: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 56 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2009 Fiat Panda were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Suspension arm pins and bushes (front).

Summary

The 2009 Fiat Panda follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 8,653 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
56 in every 100
Did not pass first time
44 in every 1003,788 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
16 yearsabout 70,026 miles
First tests counted
8,653

What failed most often

  1. Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)12 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2009 Fiat Panda vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the shock absorbers (front): 4.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 3,787 of 3,788 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Shock absorbers (front)

Failed on 337 first tests4.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 365 first tests, 3.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Failed on 318 first tests3.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Slight seepage that leaves a film of fluid on a shock absorber does not fail it. Severe leakage, or damage so that it does not function, is Major. A shock absorber missing or likely to become detached is graded Dangerous, though a missing one is only rejected if shock absorbers were fitted as standard.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 278 first tests, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 472 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Pins and bushes on suspension arms fail as Major when they are excessively worn. They are graded Dangerous when likely to become detached. DVSA uses the same wording for a suspension joint.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Three faults. The strongest is the brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear): 4.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear)

Failed on 207 first tests4.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A wheel giving less than a set share of the maximum effort from the other wheel on the same axle is Major. On a steered axle, less than half is graded Dangerous. Testers disregard an imbalance if the lower effort is the result of a locked wheel, or if the higher effort from a wheel is at or below a low set figure.

Handbrake performance (roller test, rear)

Failed on 119 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A parking brake that is inoperative on one side is Major. When tested on the road, the failure is the vehicle deviating excessively from a straight line. Vehicles whose parking brake was already tested as the secondary brake are not tested again for this.

Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)

Failed on 408 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake with efficiency below the minimum requirement is Major, and graded Dangerous where efficiency is less than half of the required value. On a roller brake tester, the requirement counts as met if more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock. The check applies only to vehicles whose parking brake was not already tested as the secondary brake.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre tread depth (rear), 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 213 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: individual direction indicators (rear), 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 179 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the petrol emissions not tested: 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions not tested

Failed on 124 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On a petrol car, an emissions test recorded as not tested or unable to be completed is failed as Major. DVSA's wording gives no reason why.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 332 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: exhaust system (front), 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Exhaust system (front)

Failed on 168 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Noted on 49 first tests11 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring mounting (rear)

Noted on 45 first tests7.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Transmission oil leaks (front)

Noted on 44 first tests4.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension spring mounting area (rear)

Noted on 32 first tests4.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

Coil spring (front)

Noted on 407 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar (front)

Noted on 26 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (front)

Noted on 88 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
56in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
6in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
38in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 56.2% of 8,653 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 62.3%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 6 fixed and the 38 not fixed make the 44 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol8,18169,220 miles5756
Diesel47185,649 miles5053

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005200920152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020092020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 57 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200449 in every 1001,898
200552 in every 1002,329
200653 in every 1003,045
200753 in every 1004,080
200852 in every 1003,891
2009 This car56 in every 1008,653
201057 in every 1007,823
201158 in every 1004,871
201264 in every 1005,966
201365 in every 1007,045
201468 in every 1007,563
201570 in every 1007,591
201673 in every 1004,645
201776 in every 1003,400
201879 in every 1002,590
201981 in every 1002,470
202083 in every 1001,727
202185 in every 1001,091
202290 in every 100680

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2009 Panda.

Of 2009 Panda vehicles with under 45,000 miles, 68 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 98,000 miles or more, 47 in every 100 did.

Under 45,0001,767 tests
68
45,000–62,0001,671 tests
59
62,000–78,000 Typical car1,730 tests
55
78,000–98,0001,741 tests
52
98,000 and over1,741 tests
47

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol69,220 miles5756
Diesel85,649 miles5053

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 85,649 against 69,220). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 45,00062,000–78,00098,000 and over
Suspension arm pins and bushes (front)5.55.75.3
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)1.54.88.9
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.04.88.3
Shock absorbers (front)1.74.64.4
Tyre tread depth (front)2.63.64.8

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

25in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

49in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

11in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2009 Fiat Panda follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Suspension arm pins and bushes (front), about 12 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 56.2% of 8,653 first MOTs on the 2009 Fiat Panda passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 62.3%. Among 3,788 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Shock absorbers (front) appears more often than on similar cars (8.9% of those tests; 337 observed failures; about 4.5× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2009 Fiat Panda at the first attempt were Suspension arm pins and bushes (front) (12.5%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (11.2%) and Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (10.8%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Shock absorbers (front) (8.9% of those tests; 337 observed failures; about 4.5× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Shock absorbers (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (8.9% of those tests; 337 observed failures; about 4.5× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2009 Fiat Panda include Shock absorbers (front), Brake imbalance across an axle (roller test, efficiency check, rear), Handbrake performance (roller test, rear). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2009 Fiat Panda (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check