DVSA open data · 1,151 tests analysed

DS Ds3 2020: reliability & common MOT faults

239 first-attempt MOT failures were recorded on the 2020 DS Ds3 in 2025. The item recorded most often on them was Linkage ball joint dust cover (front). Figures are among first-attempt failed MOT tests, not among all tests.

First-attempt pass rate 79.2% across 1,151 tests in 2025. Nothing in this year's figures separates it from the Ds3 either side — no fuel gap, and no break in the model's own trend.

79.2%

of 1,151 first tests (2025)

1,151

test year 2025

239

failed first-attempt tests

25.5%

Linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

MOT pass rates

First-attempt and official-style rates among class 4 first tests of the year.

79.2%

of 1,151 first tests (2025)

82.8%

incl. same-day PRS fixes

1,151

class 4 · first MOT of the year

Typical age 5.0 yrs · median mileage 34,640 mi

vs 2024: -2.0 pp first-attempt

Note:

  • Class 4 cars · first MOT of the year per vehicle · P/PRS/F outcomes (2025 data).
  • PRS (fixed at the station the same day) counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate.
  • Raw outcomes for this cohort — not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix.
  • MOT doesn't test engine or gearbox internals.

Common faults

Failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars.

These MOT failure patterns show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age, and mileage.

Shares below are measured across the 239 failed first attempts in 2025 that the age-and-mileage comparison can be computed on.

Standout: Linkage ball joint dust cover (front) — 25.5% of this year's failed first attempts

Recorded on 61 of those tests. It tops the table on elevation — about 48× more often than on similar cars of the same age and mileage. On this year it is also the commonest failure, so it answers both questions at once. The full ranked list is in the table below.

No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.

Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
Linkage ball joint dust cover (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage ball joint dust cover
Front 61 ×48 25.5% Likely
Ball joint dust cover (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Ball joint dust cover
Front 20 ×38 8.4% Possible

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and about 2.0× more often than similar cars).

Note: Rates and comparisons are among first-attempt failed tests, not all MOTs. Patterns come from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer service bulletins, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Failures and advisories are listed separately.

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Other Ds3 years worth knowing about

Newer cars always pass more often, so a plain "best year" list would just rank by age. These are the years that beat or miss the trend their own neighbouring years set — the only age-adjusted signal this data supports.

Year vs the years either side First-attempt pass (rises with newer cars) First tests
2019 Ds3 +7.3 pp better 81.7% 2,394
2022 Ds3 +6.0 pp better 88.2% 422
2018 Ds3 -4.4 pp worse 69.6% 3,276

What to check on a 2020 Ds3

The items that failed 2020 Ds3 most often, as a share of the year's failed first attempts. This is what goes wrong, not what is unusual — the table further up the page covers that.

  • Linkage ball joint dust cover (front) — recorded on 25.5% of failed first attempts

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

Nothing in this year's figures separates it from the Ds3 either side — no fuel gap, and no break in the model's own trend. In 2025, 79.2% of 1,151 first MOTs on the 2020 DS Ds3 passed first time (PRS — items fixed at the station the same day — counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 82.8%. Among 239 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Linkage ball joint dust cover (front) appears mo…
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that failed 2020 DS Ds3s most often at the first attempt were Linkage ball joint dust cover (front) (25.5%) — each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong on the car. It is a different question from which patterns are unusual for the class, which the common-faults table answers.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Linkage ball joint dust cover (front) (25.5% of those tests; 61 observed failures; about 48× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Linkage ball joint dust cover (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (25.5% of those tests; 61 observed failures; about 48× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault — age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2020 DS Ds3 include Linkage ball joint dust cover (front), Ball joint dust cover (front). These patterns show up more often than on similar cars after we filter out sparse noise — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2020 DS Ds3 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars — not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics — this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces — but does not remove — differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • We never invent pass rates, star scores, or ranks when those data marts are missing.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check