Dacia Sandero 2018: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 71 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2018 Dacia Sandero were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Headlight aim.

Summary

The 2018 Dacia Sandero follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 12,028 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
71 in every 100
Did not pass first time
29 in every 1003,515 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
7 yearsabout 41,508 miles
First tests counted
12,028

What failed most often

  1. Headlight aim14 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Windscreen washers9 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Coil spring (front)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2018 Dacia Sandero vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar linkage pins and bushes (front): 47 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 3,514 of 3,515 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Anti-roll bar linkage pins and bushes (front)

Failed on 91 first tests47 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Excessive wear in an anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush is Major. If the pin or bush is likely to become detached, it is graded Dangerous. The wording is DVSA's general one for a suspension pin, bush or joint.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 87 first tests, 17 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage (front)

Failed on 148 first tests39 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

An anti-roll bar linkage is graded Dangerous when a suspension component is missing, likely to become detached, fractured or likely to fail. Insecure attachment that impairs directional stability is graded Dangerous too. Excessive damage or corrosion that seriously weakens the part is Major, and so is plain insecure attachment to the chassis or axle.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 287 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults and two wear patterns. The strongest is the headlight levelling device: 21 times as often as on similar cars.

Headlight levelling device

Failed on 103 first tests21 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A headlamp levelling device that is inoperative is graded Major, and so is a manual levelling device that cannot be operated from the driver's seat. Vehicles with high intensity discharge or LED dipped beam headlamps may have a self-levelling system, and if fitted it must work. Where it is not easy to tell, testers give the benefit of the doubt, and motor caravans are not checked.

Headlight aim not tested (front)

Failed on 32 first tests3.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Headlamp aim recorded as not tested, or unable to be tested, is a Major failure. These results must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason must be included in the additional information box.

Headlight aim (front)

Failed on 481 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Beam aim too high, too low or off to either side is Major. Where a driver's beam aim control is fitted, the aim is tested without altering the setting, and rechecked at the highest setting only if it would fail for being too low. Masks or converter kits on right hand dip headlamps are acceptable.

Headlight (front)

Failed on 207 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On vehicles first used on or after a set date, a halogen headlamp unit converted to take HID or LED bulbs fails for light source and lamp not compatible, which is Major. A complete unit built with those light sources is not failed for that. The precise position of the lamps is not part of the inspection beyond a visual look to see that they sit at about the same height and distance from each side.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the petrol emissions (with catalyst): 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Petrol emissions (with catalyst)

Failed on 151 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Emissions levels over the manufacturer's specified limits are Major, as are levels over default limits, which apply when no exact match is found for the vehicle. Dense blue or clearly visible black smoke at idle, held for a set period, is Major, except for certain older vehicles and two stroke engines where smoke is unavoidable. An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels is Major too.

Petrol engine warning light

Failed on 197 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) on a petrol engine is a Major failure when it is illuminated indicating a malfunction. The detail line DVSA gives for the same row also names an inoperative lamp. The test covers only certain petrol vehicles, depending on their age, size and fuel type.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

One fault: drive shaft joints and boots (front), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 221 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 21 first tests6.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Brake light

Noted on 29 first tests5.4 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension sub-frame (front)

Noted on 27 first tests3.9 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Coil spring (rear)

Noted on 59 first tests3.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Noted on 24 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Wheel condition (front)

Noted on 58 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
71in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
21in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 70.8% of 12,028 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 79.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 21 not fixed make the 29 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol10,96440,496 miles7171
Diesel1,06455,272 miles6772

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020152018Older carsNewer cars
4060801002018Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 75 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
201358 in every 1006,603
201454 in every 10011,590
201555 in every 10013,687
201661 in every 10013,820
201765 in every 10014,146
2018 This car71 in every 10012,028
201975 in every 10012,106
202079 in every 1008,817
202186 in every 1007,869
202289 in every 10012,554

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2018 Sandero.

Of 2018 Sandero vehicles with under 26,000 miles, 83 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 60,000 miles or more, 60 in every 100 did.

Under 26,0002,333 tests
83
26,000–37,0002,526 tests
76
37,000–47,000 Typical car2,394 tests
70
47,000–60,0002,319 tests
64
60,000 and over2,453 tests
60

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol40,496 miles7171
Diesel55,272 miles6772

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 55,272 against 40,496). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 26,00037,000–47,00060,000 and over
Headlight aim2.23.85.9
Windscreen washers1.92.83.2
Coil spring (front)0.92.63.4
Brake pads (front)0.92.52.6
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)1.31.81.5

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

43in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

28in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

7in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2018 Dacia Sandero follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Headlight aim, about 14 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 70.8% of 12,028 first MOTs on the 2018 Dacia Sandero passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 79.4%. Among 3,515 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Anti-roll bar linkage (front) appears more often than on similar cars (4.2% of those tests; 148 observed failures; about 39× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2018 Dacia Sandero at the first attempt were Headlight aim (13.7%), Windscreen washers (9.0%) and Coil spring (front) (8.2%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Anti-roll bar linkage (front) (4.2% of those tests; 148 observed failures; about 39× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Anti-roll bar linkage (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (4.2% of those tests; 148 observed failures; about 39× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2018 Dacia Sandero include Anti-roll bar linkage (front), Headlight levelling device, Anti-roll bar linkage pins and bushes (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2018 Dacia Sandero (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check