Model Reports 8 min read Updated 11 Sep 2026 DVSA open data · 13,687 tests analysed

Dacia Sandero 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

6,109 first-attempt MOT failures were recorded on the 2015 Dacia Sandero in 2025. The items recorded most often on them were Coil spring (front) and Drive shafts — Joints (front). Figures are among first-attempt failed MOT tests, not among all tests.

Petrol Sanderos passed first time 7.3 pp more often than diesel ones (57.8% of 9,178 vs 50.5% of 4,509).

First-attempt pass

55.4%

of 13,687 first tests (2025)

First tests

13,687

test year 2025

Failed first attempts

6,109

failed first-attempt tests

Most common fail

22.1%

Coil spring (front)

MOT pass rates

First-attempt and official-style rates among class 4 first tests of the year.

First-attempt pass

55.4%

of 13,687 first tests (2025)

Official-style pass

62.3%

incl. same-day PRS fixes

First tests

13,687

class 4 · first MOT of the year

Typical age 10.0 yrs · median mileage 65,246 mi

vs 2024: -2.1 pp first-attempt

Note:

  • Class 4 cars · first MOT of the year per vehicle · P/PRS/F outcomes (2025 data).
  • PRS (fixed at the station the same day) counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate.
  • Raw outcomes for this cohort — not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix.
  • MOT doesn't test engine or gearbox internals.

Common faults

Failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars.

These MOT failure patterns show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age, and mileage.

Shares below are measured across the 6,106 of 6,109 failed first attempts that recorded an odometer reading in 2025 — the subset the age-and-mileage comparison can be computed on.

Standout: Linkage pins and bushes (front) — 4.8% of this year's failed first attempts

Recorded on 295 of those tests. It tops the table on elevation — about 31× more often than on similar cars of the same age and mileage. That is what makes it unusual for its class, which is a different question from what is most likely to fail; the buying checklist ranks by that. The full ranked list is in the table below.

Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
Linkage pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage pins and bushes
 Front 295 ×31 4.8% Strong
Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage
 Front 263 ×29 4.3% Strong
Electrical equipment — Horn
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Electrical equipment > Horn
 Any 678 ×16 11.1% Strong
Headlamp levelling device
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamps > Headlamp levelling device
 Any 148 ×16 2.4% Strong
Drive shafts — Joints (front)
Body, chassis, structure > Transmission > Drive shafts > Joints
 Front 987 ×4.8 16.2% Likely
Coil spring (front)
Suspension > Springs > Coil springs > Coil spring
 Front 1,349 ×3.9 22.1% Likely
Registration plate lamp(s) (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Registration plate lamp(s)
 Rear 356 ×2.7 5.8% Possible
Service brake performance (rear)
Brakes > Brake performance > Service brake performance > Rbt > Service brake performance
 Rear 327 ×2.6 5.4% Possible
Ball joint (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Ball joint
 Front 739 ×2.1 12.1% Possible

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and about 2.0× more often than similar cars).

Note: Rates and comparisons are among first-attempt failed tests, not all MOTs. Patterns come from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer service bulletins, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Failures and advisories are listed separately.

Wear patterns

Usage and mileage effects that often track road use rather than model design.

These patterns look like wear or usage effects rather than model-specific design faults. Tyres, brake friction material, and alignment-related defects often track mileage and road use.

Pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
Brake discs (front)
Brakes > Mechanical brake components > Brake discs and drums > Brake discs
 Front 225 ×2.0 3.7% Wear
Note: These patterns are not treated as a model design fault in our common-faults ranking.

Advisories

Notes recorded at the test that appear more often than on similar cars.

Advisory notes recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear more often than on similar cars.

Advisory pattern Location Notes vs similar cars Share Confidence
Linkage pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage pins and bushes
 Front 280 ×14 4.6% Strong
Pipes and hoses
Steering > Power steering > Pipes and hoses
 Any 22 ×5.7 0.4% Elevated
Macpherson strut (front)
Suspension > Macpherson strut > Macpherson strut
 Front 85 ×4.5 1.4% Elevated
Pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Pins and bushes
 Front 52 ×4.5 0.9% Likely
Suspension arm (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Suspension arm
 Front 118 ×3.8 1.9% Elevated
Brake fluid
Brakes > Hydraulic systems > Brake fluid
 Any 34 ×3.7 0.6% Possible
Other suspension component (rear)
Suspension > Other suspension component > Other suspension component
 Rear 39 ×3.6 0.6% Elevated
Pedal
Brakes > Service brake pedal or hand lever > Pedal
 Any 53 ×3.3 0.9% Elevated
Note: Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

On this year, prefer the petrol. The diesel cars passed first time 7.3 pp less often, on 4,509 tests.

This year also sits 2.2 pp below the midpoint of the 2014 and 2016 cars either side of it — a real break in the model's own run, not the usual year-on-year drift.

Other Sandero years worth knowing about

Newer cars always pass more often, so a plain "best year" list would just rank by age. These are the years that beat or miss the trend their own neighbouring years set — the only age-adjusted signal this data supports.

Year vs the years either side First-attempt pass (rises with newer cars) First tests
2013 Sandero +3.7 pp better 57.5% 6,603
2014 Sandero -2.6 pp worse 53.9% 11,590

What to check on a 2015 Sandero

The items that failed 2015 Sanderos most often, as a share of the year's failed first attempts. This is what goes wrong, not what is unusual — the table further up the page covers that.

  • Coil spring (front) — recorded on 22.1% of failed first attempts
  • Drive shafts — Joints (front) — recorded on 16.2% of failed first attempts
  • Ball joint (front) — recorded on 12.1% of failed first attempts
  • Electrical equipment — Horn — recorded on 11.1% of failed first attempts
  • Headlamp aim — recorded on 8.0% of failed first attempts

Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

Petrol Sanderos passed first time 7.3 pp more often than diesel ones (57.8% of 9,178 vs 50.5% of 4,509). In 2025, 55.4% of 13,687 first MOTs on the 2015 Dacia Sandero passed first time (PRS — items fixed at the station the same day — counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 62.3%. Among 6,109 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Linkage pins and bushes (front) appears more often than…
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that failed 2015 Dacia Sanderos most often at the first attempt were Coil spring (front) (22.1%), Drive shafts — Joints (front) (16.2%) and Ball joint (front) (12.1%) — each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong on the car. It is a different question from which patterns are unusual for the class, which the common-faults tabl…
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Linkage pins and bushes (front) (4.8% of those tests; 295 observed failures; about 31× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Linkage pins and bushes (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (4.8% of those tests; 295 observed failures; about 31× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault — age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Dacia Sandero include Linkage pins and bushes (front), Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front), Electrical equipment — Horn. These patterns show up more often than on similar cars after we filter out sparse noise — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Dacia Sandero (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars — not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics — this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces — but does not remove — differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • We never invent pass rates, star scores, or ranks when those data marts are missing.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check