Citroen Xsara 2006: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 51 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2006 Citroen Xsara were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2006 Citroen Xsara follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 3,582 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
51 in every 100
Did not pass first time
49 in every 1001,751 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
19 yearsabout 97,978 miles
First tests counted
3,582

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)13 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)10 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake light10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2006 Citroen Xsara vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt mounting area (front), 13 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 1,742 of 1,751 failed first attempts (99.5%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Seat belt mounting area (front)

Failed on 111 first tests13 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

A seat belt anchorage likely to become detached in the event of a collision is graded Dangerous. The load bearing structure near an anchorage, called a prescribed area, is Major when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Anchorage points are inspected for all seat belts fitted, except a belt with no corresponding seat.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

Two faults. The strongest is the vehicle structure condition (front): 6.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Vehicle structure condition (front)

Failed on 66 first tests6.9 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Structure that is fractured, deformed, corroded, modified or inadequately repaired is failed on rigidity only if the overall structural rigidity of the vehicle is significantly reduced. Structure that is likely to affect steering or braking adversely is graded Dangerous. Prescribed areas are not covered here, as they are checked under other sections, including brakes and steering.

Chassis condition (front)

Failed on 37 first tests3.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A main load-bearing structural member that is fractured, deformed, modified or inadequately repaired is Major when structural rigidity is significantly reduced, and Dangerous where steering or braking is likely to be adversely affected. Corrosion of the body, cab or chassis at a mounting point is Dangerous where overall security or stability is impaired.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 20 first tests, 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Steering

One fault: steering rack (front), 6.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Steering rack (front)

Failed on 59 first tests6.7 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Steering gear casing retaining devices dangerously loose, or visible relative movement to the chassis or bodywork, is graded Dangerous. A casing not properly attached, or fractured, is Major, but a fracture that affects the stability or attachment of the casing is Dangerous. A gaiter damaged but still keeping dirt out is Minor, and Major once missing or no longer doing so.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

Three faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar ball joint (front): 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar ball joint (front)

Failed on 41 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

On an anti-roll bar ball joint, DVSA fails a suspension pin, bush or joint that is excessively worn as Major. One likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Suspension mounting area (front)

Failed on 38 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Failed on 101 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Excessive wear on an anti-roll bar linkage ball joint is Major. A joint likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 92 first tests, 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Other power steering components

Noted on 41 first tests4.6 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Power steering pipes and hoses

Noted on 33 first tests3.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Seat belt condition (front)

Noted on 33 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
51in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
8in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
41in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 51.1% of 3,582 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 59.2%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 8 fixed and the 41 not fixed make the 49 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol2,26192,584 miles5050
Diesel1,320106,687 miles5354

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020062010Older carsNewer cars
40608010020062010Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 50 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200151 in every 100560
200252 in every 100903
200352 in every 1001,258
200450 in every 1001,850
200549 in every 1002,145
2006 This car51 in every 1003,582
200749 in every 1003,429
200849 in every 1001,965
200953 in every 1001,821
201052 in every 100954

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2006 Xsara.

Of 2006 Xsara vehicles with under 71,000 miles, 60 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 128,000 miles or more, 47 in every 100 did.

Under 71,000723 tests
60
71,000–89,000686 tests
53
89,000–107,000 Typical car745 tests
48
107,000–128,000699 tests
47
128,000 and over714 tests
47

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol92,584 miles5050
Diesel106,687 miles5354

Figures are in every 100 first tests. At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 71,00089,000–107,000128,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)2.27.18.8
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)4.74.66.2
Brake light3.04.85.5
Headlight aim2.63.44.6
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)5.12.82.0

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

20in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

56in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

10in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2006 Citroen Xsara follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 13 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 51.1% of 3,582 first MOTs on the 2006 Citroen Xsara passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 59.2%. Among 1,751 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Seat belt mounting area (front) appears more often than on similar cars (6.4% of those tests; 111 observed failures; about 13× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2006 Citroen Xsara at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (13.3%), Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (9.9%) and Brake light (9.9%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Seat belt mounting area (front) (6.4% of those tests; 111 observed failures; about 13× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Seat belt mounting area (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (6.4% of those tests; 111 observed failures; about 13× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2006 Citroen Xsara include Seat belt mounting area (front), Vehicle structure condition (front), Steering rack (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2006 Citroen Xsara (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check